Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Ibru

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. I see unanimity among those relying on policies and guidelines. Additional relists seem to garner no new opinions. Owen× ☎ 15:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuel Ibru

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable businessperson who doesn't satisfy any of WP:SIGCOV, WP:INDEPENDENT, or WP:SECONDARY. Article relies largely on materials that are either primary or unreliable. Does not pass WP:GNG, WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Every material cited in this article are all from reliable/independent news/media houses in Nigeria/Africa.

You need to point out to us which of the information contained herein is not from a reliable source.

Regards. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 13:39, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sources primarily include passing mentions. Does not meet WP:SIGCOV. TLA (talk) 04:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. There are atleast five sources on that article that talked about the subject particularly.

Biography pages have been created here with less. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 10:11, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jay Kenechukwu, could you please perform WP:THREE? TLA (talk) 00:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Materials cited are from reliable source Dahunsitemitope (talk) 20:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: this is very likely a WP:SPA. TLA (talk) 00:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@I'm tla That's obvious now. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There's a draft at Draft:Emmanuel Ibru which couldn't survive any AfC review before it was created by the author directly on mainspace, abandoning the draft. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

A different editor created that. Reach out to the editor. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 15:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Sources found are all routine mill news, name mentions, listings, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing. If I missed something, post the best WP:THREE IS RS with SIGCOV and ping me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TimothyBlue (talk • contribs) 04:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Closely connected with Michael Ibru and the Ibru Organization, which are both notable in Nigeria. Associated with many notable entities in Nigeria. Batmanthe8th (talk) 19:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your support and comment. I think most of the editors/administrators clamoring for a "deletion" are not familiar with the "subject" and the Nigerian social establishment. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 15:24, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Batmanthe8th @Jay Kenechukwu Being closely connected to a notable topic doesn't guarantee notability. But it does give us a redirect target (Ibru Organization) as an WP:ATD. What do you think about that? -- asilvering (talk) 23:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.