Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Dean Studey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This decision can be revisited should any evidence come to light. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Dean Studey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page should be deleted because it is based purely on speculation. The article is about a man whose daughter claims that he is a murderer. The bodies of his alleged victims were supposedly located in a well. This well was searched by authorities and they discovered no evidence of anything. This article is about a man who is only "notable" for claims with no evidence, and it should be deleted for this reason. Silent-Rains (talk) 03:50, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Iowa. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:04, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment appears GNG based on the sources, but appears to be speculation at this point. I'd rather recreate it when the story is confirmed, one way or the other. Oaktree b (talk) 23:04, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Unusual case well covered in sources. Meets WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:30, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:04, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per WP:CRIMINAL, this is basically a report of an investigate into a possible murder suspect. Judging by the final sentence, there was o evidence of his being a serial killer. Though this investigation has attracted some international interest, its inconclusive outcome makes it unsuitable for a Wikipedia article. Sionk (talk) 15:44, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BIO1E, this individual was only notable due to claims of a crime made by his daughter that have so far been unsubstantiated. The event probably isn't notable per WP:NOTNEWS as it only received coverage over a very short period of time, meaning there is nothing to redirect to. Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:24, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.