Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave and Chuck "The Freak"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 14:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dave and Chuck "The Freak" (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Article about a single-station local radio program airing only in a single media market, with very little reliable sourcing to pass WP:NMEDIA: of the nine sources here, six are primary sources, user-generated chat forums and blogs that cannot confer notability at all. And of the three sources that do actually constitute reliable source coverage, they're all to local media in the show's own home market. This is not enough sourcing to make a single-market radio show notable, however: if you cannot show nationalized coverage demonstrating that the show is known beyond its own local market, then getting it past NMEDIA takes a lot more than just three pieces of the type of coverage that every radio show in existence always gets in the local media. Bearcat (talk) 22:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Another unnotable morning zoo among many unnotable morning zoos; doesn't help that the article is a spelling nightmare and most of the sources are complete WP:PROMO inaneness. Nate • (chatter) 02:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:03, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.