Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Covey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdraw and keep with zero delete votes. (NAC) SwisterTwister talk 01:31, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Covey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a theatrical lighting designer. Ref searches turn up next to noting in secondary sources. Suspect he does not meet WP:GNG. New Media Theorist (talk) 20:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - this is a primary source, but looks good to me. Bearian (talk) 20:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I suppose although I was seriously considering deleting as WP:TNT but I suppose this is acceptable and I also found other passing coverage with Books, News and highbeam ("Dan Covey lighting designer"). SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If both Bearian and SwisterTwister vote keep, then I probably got this wrong. I'm going to look up how to withdraw the nomination, in order to save us all some time. New Media Theorist (talk) 00:28, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note to Admin It is OK to close this as Speedy keep, as it appears that I made a mistake by nominating it. All votes were Keep. New Media Theorist (talk) 00:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.