Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cybercamps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was I withdrew my nom, apparently I searched for Giant CAMPS instead of Giant CAMPUS. - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 04:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cybercamps

National summer camp, no assertion of notability, no sources. Searching "Cybercamps" or "Giant Camps" (their new name) turns up nothing non-trivial/ secondary on Google or Google News. - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 17:07, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep I am not coming to the same conclusion that searching for these on google news turns up nothing--perhaps you were searching for the wrong name: it is named Giant Campus. Check out these searches: [1], [2]. This yields a number of fairly detailed articles in secondary sources. Some highlights: USA Today coverage of cybercamps: [3], under the heading "For the future entrepreneurs" on this CNN money article: [4] This is way above the threshhold for keeping, in my opinion. Cazort (talk) 00:09, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, it appears I did search under the wrong name! Slap on the wrist for me... too bad most of it is behind a paywall. - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 04:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.