Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate gap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Climate change and poverty. Sandstein 20:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Climate gap (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be a neologism from a small numer of papers by a few academics -- not sure if we should merge this content into other articles (i.e. climate justice or Climate change in the United States) -- but not thinking this is an article in and of itself -- could use some more opinions here. Sadads (talk) 16:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Sadads (talk) 16:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Sadads (talk) 16:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: how does the subject of this article differ significantly from Climate change and poverty? I would argue for a possible merge.Praemonitus (talk) 23:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Praemonitus: That might be the right move. Doesn't feel independently notable in and of itself right? Sadads (talk) 00:08, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Sadads: Yes the term itself probably isn't notable; it just sounds like a buzzword. Praemonitus (talk) 02:19, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Climate change and poverty. I've seen this term used a fair amount, but that's a good catch by Praemonitus. Reywas92^Talk 19:37, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.