Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bălţi Plain
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy close, please sort this out through normal editing and a requested move if necessary. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:02, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bălţi Plain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Imaginary unexisting geographical renaming of scientifically researched Balti Steppe, no single authority-weigth reference for Balti Plain or Balti Plateau available, except a page with porn adds. Britannica calls it Balti Steppe, just as internal Moldavian and other external sources listed on the Balti steppe talk page, copied to created Bălţi Plain talk page[1] (including European Commission, etc...). Per previous discussion on the talk page, consensus was reached on the name Balti Steppe. This article may also meet criteria for speedy deletion. The template for the first nomination was deleted minutes after it was placed[2] Moldopodo (talk) 14:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (possibly speedy close): What you want is not deletion, what you want is a move back to a different title. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not quite simply only move back to the original title. If you compare the contents, it became quite different in the Bălţi Plain article, with plenty of unsourced info or otherwise simply imaginary data. The same person edited consequently the article on Geography of Moldova, making it quite a mess inserting inexistent geographic terms for well established terms and grassland types in Moldova.--Moldopodo (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirects were made again and the deletion nomination tag deleted... I have informed the original author of this invention User:Dc76.--Moldopodo (talk) 14:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Still not a reason for deletion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Did you read the article? It's the same if I called Black Sea Carpathian Mountains, stating that "hey, it's just this way because I say so and I do not care for whatever rules on Wikipedia there are, whatever sources are presented, whichever consenusus is reached"...--Moldopodo (talk) 14:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per argument above, this is a naming issue, not a content one that would require deletion. -- AdrianTM (talk) 14:58, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.