Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Latkovskaia

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 01:26, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Latkovskaia

Anna Latkovskaia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person. Article created for self-promotion purposes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.252.143 (talk) 19:40, 7 May 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

Created for IP using rationale from declined PROD. ~ GB fan 22:57, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; nothing exception here; occasionally speaks at local engagements and appears on local TV. Big deal. TJRC (talk) 23:25, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Essentially an advertisement. As typical for advertisements for lawyers, focuses on her specialties--a little different from most advertisements here for lawyers, lists them three times . Repeats the word "philantrophist" four times, with not the least evidence, except that she gives talks on elder law--which is the normal way attorney promote their practices. : G11 would also have been appropriate. DGG ( talk ) 00:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.