Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alberto Conti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alberto Conti

Looks like an autobio. A previous version was speedied as nn. Is he notable? -- RHaworth 13:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep It could use a few more references, but what is there I believe already establishes notability. Turlo Lomon 13:06, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Notability is asserted, but it really needs referencing.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 15:32, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please Keep. I will add many more references (to his publications, etc). We are uploading notable astronomers that work at the Space Telescope Science Institute for the forthcoming launch of a collaboration with Google.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Liberty001 (talk • contribs)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein 03:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but not everyone who works on a notable project is notable. "Chief Engineer for the Data Management System domain at the Hubble Space Telescope Science Institute." however is. The article is chock full of personal puffery. Read WP:COI and don't upload material like this. And you say "upload" -- where did you copy it from, and did you give us a license? Even if you did, this sort of material is not encyclopedic. Write neutral encyclopedic articles about the important people. And don't list every one of their published and unpublished papers--the most important published ones will do. After it's kept, I will reduce it to proper content and size and style. DGG (talk) 23:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This material was take from Space Telescope Science Institute Annual Reports (STScI) for the most part. STScI is operated by AURA under contract to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). This publication is in the public domain because it was created by NASA. NASA copyright policy states that "NASA material is not protected by copyright unless noted".— Preceding unsigned comment added by Albertoconti (talk • contribs)

Please don't refactor this discussion. --Tikiwont 09:30, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Obviously an autobiography, and as such does not conform to Wikipedia's NPOV policy. --Camptown 14:23, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.