User talk:SmartyPantsWithoutPants

July 2024

I didnt remove your edits. Some how the system removed yours so I added them back after I had checked on the history log. Pls do not add your opinions which is not support by reliable and independent source for WP:V. By the way, all edits are recorded even you have removed the warnings and conversation in you talk page for it is always can be viewed as long as Wikipedia exists. Again, if you continued to add unscoured and provide your opinions in the article, then you will be blocked from editing. Cassiopeia talk 23:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your continued bullying will result in being reported. If you are unfamiliar with the TOS I strongly encourage you to read them. SmartyPantsWithoutPants (talk) 23:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I say this as a third-party user who just showed up here and doesn't know either of you: from the edit history, I see no sign of anyone being bullied. You are being warned that your edits are unsourced, and that that's not allowed. That's just...true. Unsourced edits aren't allowed, and you are making them. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the continued bullying on edits for a page which you do not own will result in being reported and possibly blocked from editing. I strongly encourage you to read the Terms of Service regarding the aforementioned bullying. SmartyPantsWithoutPants (talk) 23:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, This is Wikipedia and no editors own any pages including your talk page, my talk page and everyone talk pages. I have provide you the reliable source, independent source, verification Wikipedia guidelines and pls read them. No one is bullying you as there are three editors had informed you that info added or changed need to be supported by independent, reliable source for verification. I know you are new to Wikipedia and not familiar with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for such we are trying to advise you here, so you can continue edit constructively and adhere to guidelines and not be blocked. Cassiopeia talk 23:47, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (UFC on ESPN: Lemos vs. Jandiroba) for a period of 36 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 23:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will use a VPN. This is bullshit SmartyPantsWithoutPants (talk) 23:52, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you do so and detected then you will be blocked indefinitely and cannot create any new accounts. I strongly suggest you familiar with Wikipedia guidelines and listen to experienced editor advice. Cassiopeia talk 23:54, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Joyous!. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to UFC on ESPN: Lemos vs. Jandiroba seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 21:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC 304. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: UFC 304 was changed by SmartyPantsWithoutPants (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925011 on 2024-07-26T22:19:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added that the main card is PPV, which is factually correct. Vandalism would be adding incorrect information. What the hell SmartyPantsWithoutPants (talk) 22:21, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you are interested in editing UFC event articles. I suggest you to observer for a while how those pages are being edited/were edited for a while to understand how things work here. Pls familiar yourself how to add inlincitation from books and newspapers - see Template:Cite web if the source is from the web. I STRONGLY suggest you to take a short program WP:TWA to understand some of the basic guidelines of Wikipedia. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 23:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Its a bot, and its talking about you using X.com as a reference. Nswix (talk) 00:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not a bot, I am a human SmartyPantsWithoutPants (talk) 00:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know that, you were replying to ClueBot though.

Hello SmartyPantsWithoutPants, Your edit which @user:Nswix mentioned about that you used X.com as the reference is the edit you made - see here - 1. The bot (ClueBot NG) reverted your edit and sent you a warning message above. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UFC_304&diff=next&oldid=1236855963 - here -2]. So (1) User Nswix was talking to you and not replying to the Bot and secondly as mentioned to you many times to add reference (inline citation) pls use horizontal format of Template: Cite web if the source is from the web and (3) most importantly, reference (source) is from newspapers and books. All social media including X.com are considered not independent or reliable and can not be used as a source. You have been blocked before due to the above reason and will be blocked again for a lot longer time or indefinitely you continuing to do that. I suggest you to learn about Wikipedia guidelines - again start with WP:TWA which will give you a good understanding of how thing work here. Pls observe how things are edits on the event page from experienced editors for at least many weeks to familiar with the edit norm. Cassiopeia talk 02:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was citing the main even fighters nicknames which is sourced on Wikipedia.. so why was that removed? SmartyPantsWithoutPants (talk) 02:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are essentially making up the rules as we go like you own Wikipedia. Adding the fighters nicknames adds context. Who makes you the ruler of the page? SmartyPantsWithoutPants (talk) 02:52, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries and changes to UFC 304

Hi - I just saw that you made an edit to UFC 304 with the edit summary Added main fighters nicknames to add context to those who may be first time viewers of the UFC. It is important to keep improving wiki pages to help source information to every and all ages, regardless of mental fortitude. Any removal of my work will be reported and subject to future permanent bans. No one owns this page, it is for l to share relevant information. Actions that deny such actions will no longer be tolerated. Just wanted to ask what was up with that - seems very combative, and I don't understand why removal of your work would lead to "future permanent bans". Especially as one of your subsequent edits erronously called it a "dance event" and changed the short description like this:

which is not how we normally write dates. I've reverted those last two changes because they aren't helpful. BugGhost 🦗👻 16:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's edits seem to be a mix of constructive edits and trolling, as per the above example. Considering the amount of warnings you've received, SmartyPantsWithoutPants, I'd recommend you are more careful in the future or will end up being sanctioned. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 16:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely trolling. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 16:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just typing out a message giving them the benefit of the doubt, and then I saw they deleted your user page for no reason. Yeowch. Good block. BugGhost 🦗👻 16:52, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

.... and now their block review request solidifies that even more. Definitely good block. BugGhost 🦗👻 16:55, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough BugGhost,

not trying to be combative by any means but their are some on here who seem to think they own the space. Anyone is free to add context to spaces so long as it is truthful and adds value. The fact that my information is being removed for simply trying to help those who may not be informed is beyond infuriating. SmartyPantsWithoutPants (talk) 16:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 16:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason= if I’m not unblocked I am getting on another vpn and making a new account. Adding relevant information to a page that means a lot to me isn’t a crime. Stop with the bullshit SmartyPantsWithoutPants (talk) 16:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)}} SmartyPantsWithoutPants (talk) 16:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you make another account, it will also get banned and all of its edits will be subject to immediate removal, regardless of what they say. And transphobia and threats aren't going to get you unblocked, they're going to get your talk page access revoked. --AntiDionysius (talk) 17:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SmartyPantsWithoutPants (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

if my account is not unblocked within the next 10 minutes I will simply make a new account with another VPN. We can do this the easy way and be civil or I can make another account. Enough with the bullshit. SmartyPantsWithoutPants (talk) 17:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Just another time-waster. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SmartyPantsWithoutPants (talk) 17:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As AntiDionysius says, don't bother, it'll get spotted a mile off and then be deleted again. Is this how you want to spend your weekend? You could be playing video games or something instead. And please don't be rude to people because of their gender, it's childish and unhelpful. BugGhost 🦗👻 17:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caught

Confirmed sock, JiyantTwat. --Yamla (talk) 21:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 17:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]