User talk:GreenJoe

This user may have left Wikipedia. GreenJoe has not edited Wikipedia since September 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

• (Note: I got the above from User talk:Tyciol).
  

This is in response to your question. Things are going pretty well, I'm trying to pass the time, thinking of not sleeping in an attempt to sleep early monday night to reset the 'ol biological clock. A mug of coke and 3 of coffee brewing and so forth. I've been checking out the different parts of Wikipedia and all the projects and I think if I get involved in them it'll feel like I'm doing something more productive and suited to the way I think and like to address many things. I really like your userpage, it is set up much neater and more concisely than mine. If I can ever figure out coding and graphics interfaces for wikilanguage then I might try something like that sometime. I just noticed that you got the disclaimer for talk page from me, thanks for listing and all that. It makes me wonder, I never asked but that Ardenn guy might have gotten it elsewhere too, it is like some sort of induction chain. Tyciol (talk) 02:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am GREATLY offended by your edit summary that said "re-established pre-vandalised version" when I did NOT vandalise anything. I have half a mind to report this to WP:ANI. GreenJoe 00:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never said that you vandalised anything. I said "re-established pre-vandalised version". The content "The Nipissing University Student Union Council comprises mainly of two parts: the powerful executive council and the largely uninfluential student representatives. They function in much the same way the Galactic Senate and Chancellor Palpatine co-existed, with each having incredible regard for the other's concerns. Chancellor Palpatine was a jolly sith lord and he would never have done anything to jeopardize the establishment." is plainly vandalism and the editor who inserted it will be in the history. TerriersFan (talk) 01:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

_{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hey, is there any chance you could look this over? Things have been changed when it comes to references and it would help if you could. Thanks.^Mitch32^contribs 14:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Holy cow, GreenJoe, I just noticed your request for checkuser on KillAllSpammers/TeerGrub ... and that it checked out positive and has resulted in a block. Very much appreciate your help. Also appreciate knowing ... suspected but glad to know for sure. Thirdbeach (talk) 17:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advice please: What's the etiquette/advisability around actually creating the page below Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_KillAllSpammers? It currently exists as an empty link. I realize there's always a workaround and this editor is determined, but would at least be a starting point. Thanks. Thirdbeach (talk) 20:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was a little frustrated to discover that the entire history section I added was removed. I understand the concerns about a lack of citations, but this could have been requested, or at the very least questionable sections deleted rather than the entire thing. Personally I don't think that a few controversies from the last 10 years constitutes a rigorous history of a society with over 40 years of history, but perhaps we can compromise? I am happy to put in the work of inserting varifiable references for my entire section, but I would like to know before I start the work that we are operating in good faith with one another.Jgroves (talk) 21:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I don't know if I can email it to you but I can certainly move it to a safe place for you. I've put it here. Thanks, Mallanox 19:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added categories and two books to Evan M. Whidden You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan M. Whidden. --Eastmain (talk) 15:45, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; I just wanted to rescue it, because it had been nominated for a speedy as empty and the article, while a stub, was not a good candidate for speedy. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:05, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the redirect. Funny, I have been editing articles for 2 years and still cannot for the life of me figure out how to rename pages and do redirects... Dbrodbeck (talk) 22:40, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GreenJoe! I was tempted to remove the prod on Federal presence in higher education in Canada and Higher education in the Yukon but wondered first why you consider it original research. Perhaps you saw something that I missed. Thanks, DoubleBlue (Talk) 23:26, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I'll have another closer read before I decide and I'll let you know, if you like. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 01:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you noticed that I decided to deny these prods. The Fed presence is best part of Higher Ed in Canada and I don't think it's completely covered there now. I agree there are sections of OR in the Yukon article but I think it's salvageable. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I made two claims in my edit comment:

• this is a subset of Education in Canada
• articles in Category:Higher education by country show standard practice for such categories

When you say to me "You're wrong" - which one of the above is wrong? Education in Canada consists of

• Higher education in Canada
• Post-secondary education in Canada
• Primary education in Canada

These should be grouped together in one category, which captures all elements of education in the country. This is the standard practice for categorisation throughout Wikipedia. If you don't agree with this practice, then by all means, propose changes to the policy and reach consensus for it. Telling other editors that they're wrong simply because you disagree with them is never an effective approach. Anyway, since we disagree, I'll take this to the CWNB to get input from other editors. (Please reply here, I'll watch your talk page.) Mindmatrix 01:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please note A7 specifically says schools are not eligible for speedy _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 16:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

and the same applies to Prince of Wales Public School (Barrie) _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 16:13, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AFDs would be fine. Most of the schools from Template:SCDSBSchools seems non notable. Cenarium ^Talk 16:21, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be totally honest, AfDs are also a waste of time. 99% of time elementary and middle schools are merged to the district and high schools are kept except in extenuating circumstances such as copyvios, vandalism and special awards. Just do the merge, there's no need to do an AfD. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 16:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ETA, the archives show what tends to happen: Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Schools/archive _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 16:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I concur. But there's not really much to merge here, so a proposed deletion should be okay. Cenarium ^Talk 16:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not going to contest because I don't care enough, but I can virtually guaratee you that someone will. People are passionate about schools _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 16:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I find this edit summary offensive. Please show respect for other editors and refrain from personal attacks even if you strongly disagree with their opinions. Attack the position not the editor. Thanks, DoubleBlue (Talk) 21:48, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not re-open this discussion. If you have a problem with the way I closed it the proper thing to do is bring it up at DRV. Reopening the discussion will be considered a disruptive edit. Shereth 00:45, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Chris Avenir, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Avenir. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --Alinnisawest,^{Dalek Empress} (extermination requests here) 22:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to request that there be an exception made for external links I've recently posted. It has been removed twice and I feel the fansite is produced by a recognized authority in the area. (The current developer of the SWRPG game and other game book authors have been guests on the show several times) I posted a request for review to C. Fred's talk page the first time and received no reply to my own. Please help me understand why this link is so grievously violates Wiki's policies. As I stated, I believe this content is highly relevant to the topic in which it was posted. Hye jedi (talk) 20:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Yukon College Student Union, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yukon College Student Union. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. CalendarWatcher (talk) 11:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Yukon College Student Union, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yukon College Student Union. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. CalendarWatcher (talk) 11:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Your Student Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, redirection impossible

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 00:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Victoria Serda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

• Not notable

• Advertisement
• Original research
• One opinion

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. iBen^discuss 05:35, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You commented in the last Article for deletion discussion. This article is up for deletion again.

You are welcome to comment about the discussion for deletion. Ikip 04:09, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to see so many of your contributions deleted. There is a group of editors who rescue articles by adding references called the article rescue squadron, which I invite you to join.

Hello, GreenJoe. You have been invited to join the Article Rescue Squadron, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. For more information, please visit the project page, where you can >> join << and help rescue articles tagged for deletion and rescue. Ikip 04:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Plunkett (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable band that fails WP:BAND and has been marked as unreferenced and may not meeting music notability guidelines for over a year and a half.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aspects (talk) 03:12, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Canadian Student Association has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated User:GreenJoe/thereisnospoon for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GreenJoe/thereisnospoon. Cunard (talk) 00:21, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to improve this page. As it is, it's a mash of rumor, misinformation, and stuff from the General Union. I'm more than willing to get sources to improve the page quality so that it makes it into the Japan Project and the Education Project. I'd appreciate any helpKeroroGunso (talk) 01:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ellen Durkee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellen Durkee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Claude Genest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per WP:GNG. As a politician he was never elected, as an actor he's held only minor roles. No sources to back up most of the content here.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. West Eddy (talk) 15:29, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lida Hensley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lida Hensley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 15:37, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sandra Finley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced biography of a living person with no indication of notability per WP:GNP or WP:POLITICIAN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. West Eddy (talk) 15:40, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Lewis Ashmore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. West Eddy (talk) 15:44, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandra Finley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Finley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 20:15, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claude Genest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claude Genest (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 23:42, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:University book publishers of Canada, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 09:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gp-pei.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Prince Edward Island with maple leaf pattern.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Used only on a userpage that is a collection of images. Fails WP:NOTWEBHOST #2. Unlikely to be useful elsewhere in the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Sask Party.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Used only on a userpage that is a collection of images. Fails WP:NOTWEBHOST #2. Unlikely to be useful elsewhere in the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Saskatchewan with maple leaf pattern.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Used only on a userpage that is a collection of images. Fails WP:NOTWEBHOST #2. Unlikely to be useful elsewhere in the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Green party of nova scotia (emblem).png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Used only on a userpage that is a collection of images. Fails WP:NOTWEBHOST #2. Unlikely to be useful elsewhere in the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:PVQ.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Used only on a userpage that is a collection of images. Fails WP:NOTWEBHOST #2. Unlikely to be useful elsewhere in the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:PEI Tories.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Used only on a userpage that is a collection of images. Fails WP:NOTWEBHOST #2. Unlikely to be useful elsewhere in the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gp-pei.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:University of Ontario Institute of Technology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Move This House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced stub

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:48, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Move This House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Move This House until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Postal codes in Canada has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:07, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]