User talk:Adamstom.97

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
SEMI-RETIRED

I am no longer active much on Wikipedia and may not respond to messages promptly, though I still have a watchlist of articles that I intend to keep an eye on and get involved with when I can.
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Thank you!

Thank you for your contributions to the wikipedia page and for clarifying any mishaps! Arodroe25 (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My FAC

Hey, if you have a little free wiki time soon, would you want to do an image review for my first FAC? The prose and source reviews are pretty well covered, so I'm mostly just looking for an experienced editor to do the image review even though it's probably the easiest part of the FAC review process. No worries if you're too busy or uninterested. -- ZooBlazer 03:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't done an FAC before but taking a quick look at your article, it seems like there may be too many images for the size and some of them are a bit tangential. You would probably benefit from cutting down the number in the development section. - adamstom97 (talk) 11:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I removed three images. I've only recently done a few reviews, but I think for FAC image reviews it mostly just involves making sure the images make sense to include in the article, make sure there is alt text, check if they are properly licensed, and check the source link (if there is one) to make sure it actually features the image/check if the link still works.
I can ask another editor to do it though if you want. I'm actually surprised it wasn't done already. For most reviews, it's the first thing done because it's the quickest and easiest part. -- ZooBlazer 17:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delayed response, busy couple of days. Looks like someone has sorted you out? - adamstom97 (talk) 09:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, it's all good now. -- ZooBlazer 16:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek: Discovery

People read that page first and will think "oh hey Blu Del Barrio was a main in all of the seasons they appear", this could cause confusion because the other page says something different. Your logic of it being clutter makes no sense. ACase0000 (talk) 03:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Casual readers just looking at the main page aren't going to be as concerned about main vs. recurring as we are. - adamstom97 (talk) 10:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And you know this how? You don't know that.. –ACase0000 (talk) 04:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know this because of how often casual readers try to change who is main vs. recurring based on their personal feelings about how much a character appears in the show. Regardless, the key information at this article is that all the listed characters were main cast members at some point. - adamstom97 (talk) 08:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phase One DYK ideas

Hey, do you have any ideas of potential hooks for Phase One? All I'm coming up with are options that would fit individual films better as opposed to the Phase. -- ZooBlazer 16:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You could probably do ones based on these lines:
  • Kevin Feige, Arad's second-in-command, realized that unlike Spider-Man and the X-Men, whose film rights were licensed to Sony and Fox, respectively, Marvel still owned the rights to many of the core members of the Avengers. Feige, a self-described "fanboy", envisioned creating a shared universe
  • Edgar Wright's pitch for Ant-Man in 2006 helped shape the early films of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Feige said some of the MCU was changed to "accommodate this version" of the film, as that version "helped to dictate what we did with the roster for Avengers the first time. It was a bit of both in terms of his idea for the Ant-Man story influencing the birth of the MCU in the early films leading up to Avengers.
You'll just want to simplify them down to get to the core ideas for both. - adamstom97 (talk) 17:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Something like these to start?
Not sure where to fit Phase One in for the first one. The second one is closer, but probably a bit of an Easter egg link. -- ZooBlazer 17:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think those are both pretty good, how about this?
- adamstom97 (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those look great. Thanks for the help! -- ZooBlazer 17:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ended up not using the Feige one as it is basically the same as the one used for Avengers (Marvel Cinematic Universe) -- ZooBlazer 18:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]