Template talk:Archive top

Template:Archive top is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

This template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 10 February 2021, see discussion. Wrapperify, 26 October 2020, see discussion.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Template:Archive top has been listed at Templates for discussion (nomination), but it was protected, so it could not be tagged. Please add:

{{subst:tfm|help=off|1=Discussion-Closed-Start}}

to the top of the page to complete the nomination. Thank you. Aza24 (talk) 12:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would anybody object to removing the extra newline from the end of this template (after the horizontal line)? This newline makes it such that a double newline (paragraph break) after the template is actually a triple newline (double paragraph break), which adds unneeded whitespace. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 20:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Use same shade of red as in Template:Abot:

Diff:

The reverse diff can be made if it's better; I'm out-of-date on HTML practice. Ursus arctos californicus (talk) 23:52, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The strong element has semantic meaning; the b element doesn't. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 06:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done as there is disagreement above, please resolve via discussion first. — xaosflux ^Talk 10:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How about <strong style="color: var(--color-error, red);"> for both? Ursus arctos californicus (talk) 21:31, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK,  Done --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:17, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Special:Diff/1242490659 (probably adding the new CSS file) caused the font size to be larger and bolded (haven't looked if there are other likely unexpected changes). On vector2022 and timeless it's noticeably bigger. For V2022, it appears to end up being 17.6px (110%) for the archive top box text, while the main body text is 100% and 16px. Not sure if it's intended or not, as the edit summaries only mention dark mode. Pinging @Sohom Datta per edit summary. Skynxnex (talk) 04:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted for now. The issue appears to be that styles moved from |abovestyles= were applied to the whole side box rather than just the |above= text. SilverLocust 💬 05:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was a unintended change on my end, @SilverLocust, @Skynxnex could you check if the current sandbox version is identical to the old template ? (I have corrected the issue, but it wouldn't hurt to get a code review). Sohom (talk) 12:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a recent version of the main template that's identical to the current sandbox markup, if that's what you mean. The preview in the sandbox looks fine to me but I haven't looked into comparing light vs dark for them. Skynxnex (talk) 13:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skynxnex, I updated Template:Archive top/sandbox/styles.css to fix the issue. (Feel free to test in the testcases page if you want to test any specific functionality). In theory both should be identical. Sohom (talk) 14:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sohom Datta: Looks good to me. SilverLocust 💬 16:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox version looks fine to me as well. Skynxnex (talk) 20:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any CSS style applied to class "side-box-abovebelow" for |status= in the live version. (Firefox, Windows 10, desktop, default theme) Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 20:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should now be fixed. Sohom (talk) 22:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It works, and no issues with dark mode. Many thanks, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]