Search results
There is a page named "Talk:Why 10 dimensions?" on Wikipedia
- paper, and which is notable or famous at least within its field." "Why 10 dimensions?" is a topic that is discussed in books such as Michio Kaku's book...10 KB (1,612 words) - 09:52, 11 July 2008
- Why "old large dimensions"? I've never heard that, so I changed it to "large extra dimensions". Sorry if anyone objects. HEL 02:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)...5 KB (636 words) - 15:19, 10 February 2024
- Both shows have mentioned each other, so Dimensions in Time is non-canonical to both shows. Digifiend (talk) 10:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC) A different approach...14 KB (2,240 words) - 16:47, 13 February 2024
- 10 September 2014 (UTC) Done Don't forget the exhaustive list at Surface-mount technology. And I'm sure there are other lists of trivial dimensions masquerading...4 KB (578 words) - 08:54, 5 February 2024
- I've created this page after discovering a lot of material on extra time dimensions on the F-theory page, some of which is wrong and most of which is distracting...14 KB (1,903 words) - 22:32, 23 June 2024
- article to Rotation formalisms in three dimensions. I did think about Rotation parametrizations in three dimensions; but this article is so much about the...34 KB (5,271 words) - 04:17, 9 March 2024
- added by 119.236.253.231 (talk) 03:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Why does the opening read “Lego Dimensions is a Lego science fiction action-adventure[1][2] video...7 KB (1,052 words) - 22:47, 23 June 2024
- 2015 (UTC) There's a helpful see also header pointing to why consistency requires 10 dimensions. Unfortunately, all I get is a link to String theory (note...27 KB (3,899 words) - 05:22, 9 March 2024
- cannot be done for all dimensions of Euclidean space, that does not seem to be sufficient reason to stop doing it in two dimensions. In other words, using...7 KB (1,109 words) - 20:23, 16 March 2024
- Talk:M-theory/Archive 2 (section "11 dimensions of spacetime are identified as 7 higher-dimensions + the 4 common dimensions (11D st = 7 hd + 4D)")theory in 11 dimensions (11D)..." The general public is very familiar with seeing/hear "3D", so expressing 10 dimensions as 10D and 11 dimensions as 11D is...6 KB (757 words) - 03:01, 2 February 2023
- Talk:Dimension/Archive 1 (section Multiple Dimensions)an object? Since when do angles used to describe orientation count as "dimensions"? I have reverted the introduction. Brian Jason Drake 06:34, 20 November...34 KB (5,111 words) - 14:11, 31 January 2023
- Talk:Dimension (section Higher Dimensions)behaviour of object. However according to string theory Earth exist minimum 10 dimensions on it. Nik heartman (talk) 16:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC) With the thought...68 KB (9,960 words) - 00:14, 9 March 2024
- --Salix (talk): 19:19, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Why can't cross products be defined in fifteen dimensions? The article should provide at least some explanation...73 KB (11,214 words) - 10:31, 10 July 2010
- bosonic strings live in 26 dimensions but supersymmetric string theories live in 10 dimensions. But the extra 16 dimensions of the bosonic side of the...57 KB (9,184 words) - 11:11, 3 February 2023
- node from "10" (Intel 10/Foundry 7) down through 7, 6, 3, 2.1, 1.5, and 1.0 nm (Intel 1.0/Foundry 0.7) nodes. A lot of the actual dimensions don't scale...30 KB (3,999 words) - 12:59, 13 January 2024
- infinite dimensions while the Vishnu purana doesn't even mention infinite dimensions does that mean Vishnu creates Like infinite dimensions casually?...4 KB (356 words) - 13:00, 3 June 2024
- 2005 (UTC) Reason for 'no': In addition to geometrical dimensions there are also physical dimensions, which are already height, width, depth and time (multiplied...31 KB (3,927 words) - 01:54, 30 April 2024
- 22 May 2024 (UTC) Article isn't really clear on when extra dimensions were added and why. Was it part of the original string formulation? Was it added...8 KB (1,060 words) - 23:44, 22 May 2024
- Talk:Remington R51 (section Dimensions)The dimensions that the article listed matched these official dimensions, so I don't know why you would go and delete them. Silencertalk (talk) 23:10, 18...4 KB (427 words) - 08:24, 8 March 2024
- May 2011 (UTC) @Stephan Leeds: Why is it "notional"? I can't see how it is any more notional than the linear dimensions. Thanks incidentally for adding...8 KB (1,252 words) - 03:12, 10 August 2024
- dimensions. *Insanity is the logic of an accurate mind overtaxed. are also listed on OWH Sr.'s page. Which one is correct? -203.219.227.6 15:00, 10 October
- ghosts. The dominant figure, both because he was bigger in all three dimensions, and because he sat centrally in the length of the table, facing me, was
- of a building." No no no... Come on, people. [1] Kaycee, why these? r3m0t (cont) (talk) 01:10, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC) I know about the problems associated with