Talk:Recrystallization (metallurgy)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
This is the first draft and extensive writing/checking is needed. Please note that my fingers have a strong tendency to type the British spelling (recrystallisation) instead of the US version (recrystallization) used by the author of the disambiguation page. I try to find them but I've probably missed a few. Slinky Puppet 18:20, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Further Work
- 'Types' of recrystallisation such as strain induced boundary migration (SIBM) and particle stimulated nucleation (PSN).
- The importance of orientation gradients for formation of HAGB's and viable nuclei
- Extension to a) dynamic and b) continuous mechanisms
- Comparison and contrast with recovery, grain growth and secondary (abnormal) grain growth
- (Brief) Industrial applications of recrystallisation e.g. manipulation of grain structure in Al-Mn alloys for aluminium cans
- Pictures
Any help appreciated Slinky Puppet 17:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Mergers
- There a quite a few articles on aspects of crystals and Crystallization. I wonder to what degree some of these articles could be merged. For example, It seems that crystal growth is quite closely related to Crystallization (engineering aspects).
- See also:
- Crystal
- Crystal structure
- Crystallite
- Crystallization
- Crystal growth
- Fractional crystallization
- Recrystallization
- Seed crystal
- Single crystal
- and articles cited therein also!
- I suspect it would take a brave person to try and untangle/merge these articles !! -- Quantockgoblin 13:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
sentence missing!
in the paragraph with the following information it has definitely to be mentioned, for which metal this is valid! surely not steel... ->"Fe increases the recrystallization temperature by around 100°C" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.226.128.26 (talk) 12:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Mistypings
- In "The deformation fields around large (<1μm) non-deformable particles" I think it is meant a ">" sign, instead of the "<", right?
- In the "bimodal" topic, there is a "bimodel" in the paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdionteles (talk • contribs) 08:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- I fixed your second note, however, someone more knowledgeable than me would have to answer your first question. Wizard191 (talk) 15:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Please make this article accessible to laymen
I couldn't make heads or tails of it at all... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.139.226.37 (talk) 11:09, 5 June 2009 (UTC)