Talk:Pekka Hämäläinen

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

notable per bancroft prize. Pohick2 (talk) 23:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:BLP1E. Abductive (reasoning) 00:18, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:PROF 2: "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." Pohick2 (talk) 03:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • The Bancroft Prize article does not have secondary sources backing the claim that "The prize is generally considered the most prestigious award in the field of American history writing...", and until it does I remain unconvinced. Abductive (reasoning) 03:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • "Columbia Announces 2009 Bancroft Prize Winners", History News Network, March 25, 2009 if you really want to try an AfD, i will be happy to provide lots of references at that time.[1] Pohick2 (talk) 13:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • is the Onion a secondary source? "Who Do I Have To Blow To Win The Bancroft Prize In American History?", Onion, Lawrence Sharpless, January 23, 2002 Pohick2 (talk) 14:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]