Talk:NDTV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Completely biased context for NDTV

This wiki, as against all other Wikis I've ever read, is completely biased. It is showing as if rest of Media in India is sold. Where is proof for that. Every where it is trying to show how good NDTV team is and how villain BJP and Adani are. It doesn't mention how NDTV was started, what kind of short cuts, Prannay Roy took to gain power in Media industry. It doesn't mention about why favours were returned to Mr Ghosh (Father in law of Rajdip Sardesai). There is so much that should have been highlight if someone writing here is so honest.. but unfortunately, the attempt has been made to show NDTV as great honest channel, which it has never been. I don't belong to any party including BJP, but being an Indian I believe the channels need to do an honest job in highlighting true work of a government, not favouring specific channels. When Congress was on looting spree, this same channel had no issue with that. Where is their coverage on Commonwealth, 5G or Coal scams?? 223.190.81.231 (talk) 12:09, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is written by summarising reliable sources. Please provide reliable sources for any claims you want to make. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:30, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to edit and write with sources. Gsgdd (talk) 01:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peacock terms in lead

Regarding the Template:Peacock, the lead currently includes, as just one example, this phrase: The company is considered to be a legacy brand that pioneered independent news broadcasting in India, and is credited for launching the first 24x7 news channel and the first lifestyle channel in the country. This is loaded and ambiguous wording which implies importance without supporting that. It also includes claims which are not properly supported in the body of the article, which is poor practice per WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY. Who "considers" them this? How are they "pioneers"? Who "credited" them with this, and why is this credit so important that it belongs in the first paragraph? Please see WP:PEACOCK, WP:WEASEL, and WP:NOTSOAP. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 21:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

gone through the history a user by the name Tayi Arajakte added these infoBlackOrchidd (talk) 09:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The last citadel of secularism is dowm

Nobody taking The wire seriously. ALt news founders hounded and jailed. Ravish Kumar left NDTV and turns YouTuber. NDTV becomes Godi media and relentlessly broadcasting Ram Mandir Pran Pratishtha. NDTV still reliable? BlackOrchidd (talk) 10:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BlackOrchidd The reliability WP:RS of a publication in the context of Wikipedia is determined at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. You might want to discuss it there. This talk page is to discuss about the content of the article. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 18:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I am taking this issue to WPRS NB. Plz participate. BlackOrchidd (talk) 06:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+ NDTV broadcasted Modi's Temple inaugration in Abu Dhabi without break on 14th Feb 2024. Meanwhile the protesting farmers suffered in perils at Shambhu border, NDTV didnt spared a moment of screen time during the temple inaugration. BlackOrchidd (talk) 07:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+ Finance miniter of BJP ruled government giving interview to NDTV after a long boycott by BJP leaders earlier. BlackOrchidd (talk) 07:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So? — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 17:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]