Talk:Matt Murdock (Marvel Cinematic Universe)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Matt Murdock (Marvel Cinematic Universe)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Cox3":

  • From Daredevil (TV series): Dornbush, Jonathan (October 11, 2014). "7 things we learned about Netflix's new 'Daredevil' series". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on October 12, 2014. Retrieved October 12, 2014.
  • From List of Daredevil (TV series) characters: Dornbush, Jonathan (October 11, 2014). "7 things we learned about Netflix's new 'Daredevil' series". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on October 12, 2014. Retrieved October 12, 2014.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 23:08, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article image

The season 1 poster shouldn't be used here. Here are three options that any active editor can choose from: in suit, no helmet; in full suit; as Matt Murdock. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:08, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's a new one on me. Perhaps you should address that on Talk:Shuri (Marvel Cinematic Universe) as well if it is a really legitimate guideline. The middle one is best so far. But I wonder if there could be better. Jhenderson 777 23:25, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Taking what I said back. The first one seems better. Jhenderson 777 23:29, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm leaning towards the first one as well. You get the best of both worlds in Charlie Cox's face and the Daredevil costume. ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 23:31, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree. The first one is better, just need to be uploaded (if it isn't.) — SirDot (talk) 20:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Murdock's memory being erased

I was looking at the NwH section of the article and I noticed that there is a note saying not to add that. Why isn't that important? This section is about him helping Peter Parker, and the film concludes with him no longer remembering Peter Parker. I think it is essential. Are there any objections to this? If not, I am going to add it and remove that part of the note. Osh33m (talk) 16:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a notable personal character development for Matt. It hardly affects him in any significant way we know of the same way it affected MJ, Ned and Happy. If at some point they choose to explore the impact it had on Matt, we can add it. Otherwise, we can't just go adding that for literally every character that has ever interacted with Peter Parker.— Starforce13 17:02, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention that this wasn't even shown onscreen, so technically it's OR. InfiniteNexus (talk) 02:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Although, while I do believe we will eventually see Matt Murdock/Daredevil and Peter Parker/Spider-Man onscreen together again in MCU, I don't think the spell or erasure of memory will be brought up in dialogue but can be presumed via context. --Osh33m (talk) 14:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This being the MCU, if the writers want to come up with some surprise mechanism by which the spell didn't effect Murdoch, they will. You may recall how, during the airing of WandaVision, everyone saw Wanda steal Vision's body from S.W.O.R.D. headquarters. Except that it was later revealed that she never did, she left the body there and created a mental construct of Vision later. Even seeing would not quite be believing here. BD2412 T 17:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What I meant was that I believe Daredevil was put under the spell just like everyone else, but they won't outright say that he was. It will just be assumed via dialogue i.e meeting Peter Parker for the first time again or something like that. --Osh33m (talk) 03:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said, unless this is explicitly shown onscreen, as in via a flashback (which is highly unlikely, in my opinion), it is trivial and technically OR for us to note that. That kind of WP:FANCRUFTy info is best left for the fan wiki. InfiniteNexus (talk) 03:44, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]