Talk:Juan Guaidó

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Juan Guaidó article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. South America: Venezuela Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Venezuela (assessed as High-importance). This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Venezuela High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the Main Page in the "In the news" section. You can visit the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from reliable news sources to include recent events. Notice date: 31 December 2022. Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with Template:ITN talk if appropriate.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Omer Benjakob (13 January 2019). "Venezuela Blocks Wikipedia After Maduro 'Ousted' From Article, Internet Watchdog Says". Haaretz. Retrieved 18 May 2019. Manuel Rueda (3 February 2019). "Venezuelan opposition targeted by internet censors". Associated Press. Retrieved 18 May 2019. Analysts say that this year, Guaido's Wikipedia page and social media sites have suffered blocks. Manuel Rueda (16 January 2019). "Maduro: La oposición tiene "un presidente de la república de Wikipedia"". El Comercio. Retrieved 18 May 2019. Venezuela's opposition has a 'president of the republic of Wikipedia,' ironized this Tuesday the leader Nicolás Maduro about changes on that website that they identify the leader of the opposition majority, Juan Guaidó, as head of state.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2021 and 7 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Per9yj.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... is uncited in the article, and original research, yet added to the lead. Please read WP:LEAD (leads summarize info already in the body of the article). If there is a cite supporting that "most nations ... recognize Maduro", that should be incorporated into the body of the article. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:42, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many nations made no statement regarding the crisis or who is the legitimate president of Venezuela whatsoever. 2A02:AB04:2AB:700:A5E8:1A3A:FCE4:438F (talk) 16:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this is an issue that has been discussed several times in the talk page, particularly at the start of the crisis, and that can be consulted in the archive. The current lead should stay. --NoonIcarus (talk) 22:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article is still sticking with this terminology in November 2022? When the consensus, on this talk page and across the world, is that he is NOT acting president of any country? It's not "disputed" anymore, the term is "claimed" acting president. He is a claimant to the position. He has never had the position, he has never wielded its power in any meaningful way for any time. He has not relinquished his claim, sure, but that does not make it "disputed" after this much time, it simply means one person "claims" it and one person HAS it. The House of Stuart are not the "disputed" Kings of England, they are the CLAIMED Kings of England. Donald Trump is not the "disputed" President-elect of 2020, he is the CLAIMED President-elect. I do not see Wikipedia making such mistakes elsewhere. But these anomalies in Juan Guaidó's article make Wikipedia look biased and ridiculous. --VolatileChemical (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think rather than this extraneous stuff, you should make the edit you think is appropriate. I agree generally, but best to see this in the context of specific edits. JArthur1984 (talk) 14:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why bother? it's very important to the US government that the pro-american politican is leader of that counntry and the media follows it. And wikipedia follows western media. but he was president according to who? the US constantly does this with a very long history of supporting coups against anti-american/leftist leaders in latin america to secure resources.[1] they support the guy who is very pro-american and right wing and the media follows the US coup claims as if they are the leaders of that country. But they are not. And at best, he claimed to be the president and never held to position as the official president. unless wikipedia is dictated by the us government, this article is ridiculous and blatantly supporting US long history of coups49.180.211.220 (talk) 05:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

El819 What WP:RS were you relying on when you made this edit? I suggest you look over Talk:Juan_Guaidó/Archive_5#RfC:_Is_Juan_Guaido_still_interim_president_of_Venezuela? and more recent WP:RS like this. --David Tornheim (talk) 20:55, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...is another embarrassing illustration of how Wikipedia is nothing more than a soapbox for neocon propaganda. 2600:1700:3190:9020:903E:9C5B:1EF9:ACA1 (talk) 15:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be more specific about what problems you see? Most of what it says is attributed; it's fine to attribute statements about him as long as they're due (and the things people say about him are often relevant.) I've cleaned up some bits of non-neutral language in the article voice, anyway. --Aquillion (talk) 21:20, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is Guaidó back to Voluntad Popular? Should the article be updated to reflect that? ReyHahn (talk) 09:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ReyHahn: That's a good question, I have no idea. From what I gather he has not held any related position since his exile, but the article can be upted if related information is found. --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I asked this because Guaidó is listed as VP in Next Venezuelan presidential election.--ReyHahn (talk) 21:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NoonIcarus, I agree with JArthur1984 that Hetland is from a reputable publisher, and the viewpoint is not a marginal or UNDUE one. Maybe you have more information related to why you have tagged it UNDUE? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]