Talk:Gus Fring

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gus Fring article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Fictional characters This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

I see Gus' sexuality in his description has become a point of differing opinion again. I hope not to rehash what's been said already in the first archive (Gus' sexuality, Gus being gay, Gus being queer). I agree with characterizing Gus as homosexual, or likely homosexual, but I don't agree with referring to Max Arciniega as his boyfriend, etc.

• Gus' activity as a homosexual is never made explicit; his orientation is only hinted at. Given Gus' personality, it's possible that he is extremely cautious and either never fully acknowedged his orientation with action, or was cautiously reluctant to act on his sexual desires at all, and wine bar David is the closest we see him coming to that. Gus may have cherished Max as a friend and business partner along with having homosexual feelings that were not expressed.
• I give very little weight to comments from cartel members. When used as a homophobic insult, it may come from a suspicion based on as much as the viewer has seen, too; but in the end, those slurs are just insults meant to denigrate, and are not infrequently levied without the slightest shred of evidence of a person's actual orientation.
• In my view, comments by the writers and producers outside the work itself are not canon. The wise artistic choice to make it ambiguous in the story is what defines Gus. They had a choice to make it explicit, and didn't. So meta-fiction statements can't help to define the character; they had their chance.

Not wishing to rehash the previous discussions, I would say Gus being queer is the most pertinent conversation to review if we're to pick it up again. So again, I think the material in the work of fiction itself makes it fairly clear that Gus' sexual orientation is homosexual, but it's not clear at all that Gus was a practicing homosexual, and much less clear that Max Arciniega was a romantic partner. My two cents. _signed, Willondon (talk) 18:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]