Talk:Down a Dark Hall/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 03:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Overall, a very good article. Just have a few things I would like to see.
- Perhaps add a little more to the lead about its background? For example, the feminist issue sounds interesting.
- I went ahead and added that to the lead. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- A couple sentences in the Reception section could be paraphrased.
- I paraphrased the one quote from The New York Times. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Is there any information on the sales for the book, or box office results for the film?
- I couldn't find any information about the sales for the book. I did however find box office results, so I included them in the article. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, BOM, of course. I could have just as well added that myself, haha. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 10:08, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- I couldn't find any information about the sales for the book. I did however find box office results, so I included them in the article. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- One link redirects to a different website (I'm guessing it was a name change). It was DVD Talk, which is now Top Seven Reviews (I'm not sure if it's reliable however). There's also at least one dead link, though I have since archived the sources.
- I can't find the reference you're referring to. What's the title of the article? Fearstreetsaga (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Abryn: Thanks for reviewing the article, it's really appreciated. How does it look now? Fearstreetsaga (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hey, sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. I dunno what the heck I was thinking, I must have gotten my wires crossed and mistook a source from another article as being from this one. Many apologies! The article looks good, nice job on this. I'm ready to pass. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 10:08, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Abryn: Thanks for reviewing the article, it's really appreciated. How does it look now? Fearstreetsaga (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)