Talk:C418
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 August 2011. The result of the discussion was delete. |
Requested move 11 March 2018
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: pages moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 01:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
– Per WP:COMMONNAME. He is better recognised as C418 than by his real name, by sources and media. Lazz_R 01:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Support - "C418" does not clash with any pre-existing abbreviation, so the article should be renamed per nom.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- Support per Lazz_R. Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 15:47, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Regarding recent reversion about "Rosenfeld possibly no longer contributing to Minecraft"
My edit was reverted because it was "not from a reliable source" -- however, the secondary source I referenced includes direct quotes by Rosenfeld on his own Discord server, thus there was a primary source wrapped inside this secondary source. Rosenfeld's direct quotes include: "listen guys it hurts me as well" "I'm not happy about it but so long and thanks for all the fish" (These were brought up in a conversation about why Rosenfeld was not contributing any new compositions to the game). He also said "yeah, conflict of interest definitely" and "maybe if we stack the lawyers in a pyramid something will happen". @0xDeadbeef please advise as to why such direct quotes are not worthy of documentation on this page and Music of Minecraft. I can see how perhaps including the conjecture about the true nature of the legal issues as being not as reliable, if nothing because it is from a single source, but the non conjecture portion of the addition seems very much noteworthy and definitely reliable (primary source). LMK. Samuuurai (talk) 08:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- YouTube is not a generally reliable source, see WP:RSPYT. I personally believe that SalC1 is pretty reliable for their content about Minecraft, but a consensus for this should be reached at WP:RSN first. 0xDeadbeef 08:26, 27 August 2022 (UTC)