User contributions for 89.216.234.254

8 October 2009

• 15:3615:36, 8 October 2009 diff hist −4‎ Battle of Kamdesh ‎ The two outposts make up one base...I doubt that the Afghan outpost was spared much of the destruction...so I think it is better this way

7 October 2009

• 22:3622:36, 7 October 2009 diff hist −1‎ Talk:Battle of Kamdesh ‎ →‎Result
• 22:3522:35, 7 October 2009 diff hist 0‎ Talk:Battle of Kamdesh ‎ →‎Result
• 22:3522:35, 7 October 2009 diff hist +690‎ Talk:Battle of Kamdesh ‎ →‎Result
• 22:3122:31, 7 October 2009 diff hist +109‎ Battle of Kamdesh ‎ Than at least leave this, I left a reference also
• 19:1019:10, 7 October 2009 diff hist +104‎ Battle of Kamdesh ‎ Reference for the number of wounded Afghan soldiers
• 19:0719:07, 7 October 2009 diff hist +157‎ Battle of Kamdesh ‎ My edit was referenced, the result here on Wikipedia should be fair and neutral...not just from the US military POV, they won tacticaly, but the Taliban still control much of Kamdesh
• 19:0419:04, 7 October 2009 diff hist +936‎ User talk:DJ Clayworth ‎ →‎Thanks
• 16:5416:54, 7 October 2009 diff hist +175‎ Battle of Kamdesh ‎ The result of the battle is the same as in Wanat...the US tacticaly defeated them when they repulsed the attack on the base...but the Taliban win strategicly since they still dominate the area see red
• 16:5116:51, 7 October 2009 diff hist +181‎ Battle of Kamdesh ‎ Number of wounded US soldiers is 24 according to this source...at least 2 Afghan soldiers are mentioned as wounded
• 16:4516:45, 7 October 2009 diff hist +77‎ Battle of Kamdesh ‎ The source that allegedly says 50...doesn't say 50 at all...it says that the US military found only 5 bodies...and in that ref the Taliban said that they lost only 7 men