Environmental policy of the Joe Biden administration

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The environmental policy of the Joe Biden administration includes a series of laws, regulations, and programs introduced by United States President Joe Biden since he took office in January 2021. Many of the actions taken by the Biden administration reversed the policies of his predecessor, Donald Trump. Biden's climate change policy focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, as under the Obama administration.[1][2] The main climate target of the Biden administration is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by the United States to net zero by 2050. John Kerry leads the effort as Special Envoy for Climate.[3] Biden promised to end and reverse deforestation and land degradation by 2030.[4]

On his first day in office, Biden began to make policy changes to protect the environment. He began revising and strengthening the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and ordered a number of executive orders aimed at reviewing or undoing the environmental policies of the former administration, including removal of some wildlife protections,[5] the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline,[6] and drilling for oil and gas on federal lands.[7] In the same day he rejoined the Paris Agreement.[8][9] Biden supported climate justice[10][11][12] and sustainable transport.[13][14] The Biden administration delivered a tax plan to congress aiming to wind back fossil fuel subsidies, replacing them with incentives for green energy.[15] Its proposed budget includes a 30% increase in funding for clean energy, including in rural communities.[16] Biden has ordered the amount of energy produced from offshore wind turbines to be doubled by 2030.[17][18] In April 2021, Biden hosted a virtual climate summit with 40 world leaders.[19] In November 2021, Biden and other world leaders met at the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) to negotiate goals to reduce global warming. After four years of absence under the former president, the U.S. sought to regain its credibility.[3] In November 2021 Biden signed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act,[20] a major pillar of his environmental poicy.[21] By July 2022, the Biden administration had created 54 environmental policies and proposed 43 more.[22] In August 2022, Biden signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which includes the largest federal climate change investment in American history.[23][24]

The Inflation Reduction Act alone can create 3 trillion dollars of climate investments in 2022-2032 and 11 trillion dollars in overall infrastructure investments by 2050.[25] According to some estimates, with the Inflation Reduction Act and other federal and state measures, the USA pledge in Paris agreement: 50%-52% greenhouse gas emissions reduction by the year 2030, can be "within reach".[26][27]

Climate change

Climate team personnel as of 2021

As of 2021, the following officials compose Joe Biden's climate team:[28][29]

Name Office Background
Gina McCarthy National Climate Advisor (January 2021–September 2022) EPA administrator, environmental advisor to five governors
Ali Zaidi National Climate Advisor (since September 2022) Office of Management and Budget official, a lawyer focused on sustainability and climate change
John Kerry Special Envoy for Climate Change Secretary of State, helped to create the Paris Agreement and signed it as a representative of the United States[30]
Jennifer Granholm Energy Secretary Michigan governor advocated the use of renewable energy and job creation
Deb Haaland Interior Secretary Member of Congress, co-sponsor of the Green New Deal
Michael Regan Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Secretary of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, environmental regulator
Brenda Mallory Director of Council on Environmental Quality General Counsel of the Environmental Protection Agency, environmental lawyer
Tom Vilsack Agriculture Secretary Secretary of Agriculture under President Obama

Climate change policies

Biden at the opening ceremony of the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland on November 1, 2021

The final target of the administration is reaching carbon neutrality in the United States by 2050.[31] Joe Biden sees climate change as an "existential threat",[32] a view supported by most in the scientific community.[33][34][35] During his inauguration, Biden said: "A cry for survival comes from the planet itself, a cry that can't be any more desperate or any more clear." However, some activists have criticized the administration's policies for being insufficient to prevent catastrophic climate change.[36] Democratic control of the United States Congress raises the chances that the administration will be able to pass climate-related legislation, although members like Senator Joe Manchin hold key voting positions and could block proposed bills from passing the Senate.[37]

Biden's climate plan changed significantly in 2020. In the beginning, it was criticized by many environmental groups as not being aggressive enough or even being detrimental contrary to prior stances on climate.[38] Biden consulted with them, mainly through the Biden-Sanders Unity Task Forces, and included many of their recommendations in his plans, after which it received more support.[39]

The administration set a target of achieving zero emissions from the power sector by 2035.[40] Other sectors with considerable emissions are agriculture and construction. Biden's climate plan includes a strong increase in green building. According to the plan, 4 million buildings in the United States should be upgraded, as well as 2 million weatherized in the next 4 years.[41] This is expected to create 1 million green jobs. The entire climate plan is expected to create 10 million green jobs.[42] This number is smaller than other proposals like the Green New Deal, which claims to guarantee a job for every American.[43][44]

Biden ordered the director of national intelligence Avril Haines to prepare a report about the impacts of climate change. Biden also included John Kerry – the Climate Envoy – in the National Security Council. He created a National Climate Task Force and the White House Office of Domestic Climate Policy. He said: "In my view, we've already waited too long to deal with this climate crisis and we can't wait any longer. We see it with our own eyes, we feel it, we know it in our bones." and "it's time to act". He also mentioned that climate action is linked with other aspects of his agenda such as health, jobs, and security.[32]

As of August 2021, some calculations suppose that the infrastructure bill, the budget reconciliation bill, if passed, will cut emissions by 45% by 2030.[needs update] Administrative orders from Biden and some states should increase the reduction to 50%.[45]

In September 2021, the EPA planned to issue its final rule to reduce hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) emissions by 85% within 15 years. HFCs are greenhouse gases that are thousands of times more potent than CO2.[46]

In December 2021, Biden signed an executive order directing the US government to cut its own emission by 65% by 2030 with different measures including energy efficiency, electric vehicles and renewable energy.[47]

Social cost of carbon

On the first day of his presidency, Biden signed an order directing a return to the Obama-era policy of taking into account the social cost of carbon when implementing new regulations, a practice that the Trump administration abandoned in 2017.[48] In February 2021, Biden raised the social cost of carbon in the US to $51 per ton, replacing the lower Trump Administration's estimates with the estimates developed under President Obama.[49] This figure has an impact on EPA regulations but not on the fuel price.[50] Carbon pricing is already in operation in a few US states. The $51 estimate is announced to be evaluated.[clarification needed] It is lower than the EU carbon price but higher than the Chinese carbon price.[51] The administration has set the social cost of methane at $1,500 per tonne.[52]

In March 2022, the court allowed the Biden administration to use the social cost of carbon, reversing a previous court ruling.[53]

Climate legislation

In the years 2021-2022 Biden promoted 2 bills that can reduce the US greenhouse gas emissions by more than 50% from the level of 2005: the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Build Back Better Act. The Build Back Better act faced strong opposition in the Senate and was not approved.[54] The group of experts who made the analysis said that the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act alone will make only a small reduction in emissions, but they did not count at all the impact of measures regarding highways and public transport.[55] The bill includes the largest federal investment in public transit in history.[56] The bill includes spending of 105 billion dollars in public transport. It also give 110 billion on fixing roads and bridges what includes measures for climate change mitigation - access for cyclists and pedestrians.[57]

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, was approved by the Congress[58][59][60] and signed by Biden into law in November 2021.[61]

In August 2022, President Biden signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act, which contains the largest climate investment by the U.S. federal government in history, including over $391 billion to reduce carbon emissions.[23][24] The bill, passing by a 51–50 vote in the Senate, explicitly defined carbon dioxide as an air pollutant under the Clean Air Act to make the Act's EPA enforcement provisions harder to challenge in court.[62] With this law approved and additional federal and state measures, the USA can fulfill its pledge in Paris agreement: 50% greenhouse gas emissions reduction by the year 2030.[26][27]

Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

Biden's infrastructure plan is also a major pillar in his climate policy. In the beginning Biden intended to include all his climate and infratructure policies in one bill including $3 trillion investments[63][64] with a large influence on the Greenhouse gas emissions of the United States.[65] The plan, according to Biden's administration, should help rebuild the American economy and create millions of jobs. Biden's administration claims that economic and climate issues are linked.[66]

In June 2021 Biden and a group of democratic and republican senators agreed on a compromise; a $973 billion bill. According to an official press release "The Plan is the largest federal investment in public transit in history and is the largest federal investment in passenger rail since the creation of Amtrak." According to the document this should lower the GHG emission of the US.[67]

On 10 of August the bill was approved by the Senate. 19 Republican senators, including Mitch McConnell, voted for it, despite criticism from Donald Trump, who called it "the beginning of the Green New Deal". The bill includes spending of 105 billion dollars for public transit, $21 billion for environmental projects, $50 billion for water storage, $15 billion for electric vehicles.[68] 73 billion dollars will be spent on power infrastructure what includes its adjustment to renewable energy. $110 billion will be spent on fixing roads and bridges what includes measures for climate change mitigation - access for cyclists and pedestrians.[57] The plan also includes $1 billion for better connection of neighborhoods separated by transport infrastructure. According to Biden's administration the plan should add 2 million jobs per year.[69]

In November 2021 Biden, finally, signed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act wich included around $555  billion of new investments.[70] The bill is a major pillar of his environmental poicy. According to the manual of use issued in 2022, it includes over 350 programs, many of which are included in the chapter of "climate, energy and the environment" (pages 149-382), while many others, also related to the environment, are included practically in all other chapters, except of chapter "Broadband" (for example in pages 18, 40, 61, 83, 91, 103, 414, 421, 439, 443 and many more). The programs promote energy conservation, public transport, reforestation, recycling, protection from wildfires and more.[71]

Build Back Better Act

A potential $23 billion worth of tax credits for nuclear generating plants are included in the proposed bill[72] while the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act which became law included modest amounts to support older plants and DOE's Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ADRP).[73]

Inflation Reduction Act

The law is considered as the most important climate legislation in the history of the USA. It is expected to also make some impact internationally, repositioning the country as climate leader. It represents the largest investment into addressing climate change in United States history,[74] including more than $391 billion to reduce carbon emissions.[23] According to several independent analyses, the law is projected to reduce 2030 U.S. greenhouse gas emissions to 40% below 2005 levels.[75]

The bill aims to decrease residential energy costs by focusing on improvements to home energy efficiency. Measures include $9 billion in home energy rebate programs that focus on improving access to energy efficient technologies, and 10 years of consumer tax credits for the use of heat pumps, rooftop solar, and high-efficiency electric heating, ventilation, air conditioning and water heating. The bill extends the $7,500 tax credit for the purchase of new electric vehicles while also providing a $4,000 tax credit toward the purchase of used electric vehicles, in an effort to increase low- and middle-income access to this technology.[76] This is projected to lead to an average of $500 in savings on energy spending for every family that receives the maximal benefit of these incentives.[77]

The bill includes a 30% tax credit ($1,200 to $2,000 per year) and different types of rebates (reaching $14,000) for homeowners who will increase the energy efficiency of their house. In some cases, all upgrade expenses will be returned.[78]

The bill allocates $3 billion for helping disadvantaged communities with transportation matters, including reconnecting communities separated by transport infrastructure, assuring safe and affordable transportation "and community engagement activities."[76] This should improve clean transit.[79] Projects improving connectivity and walkability in these neighborhoods can get grants reaching 80%-100% of the overall cost.[80] The bill also supports biking.[81]

There are also funds allocated to national clean energy production. This includes the continuation of the production tax credit ($30 billion) and investment tax credit ($10 billion) toward clean energy manufacturing, including solar power, wind power, and energy storage.[76]

The bill also provides funds toward the decarbonization of the economy in other areas, providing various tax credits and grants toward decarbonizing the industrial and transportation sectors. This also includes a program to reduce methane emissions from production and transportation of natural gas. The bill also provides for a focus on communities and environmental justice by providing several grants targeting historically marginalized and disadvantaged communities that have been disproportionally impacted by environmental pollution and climate change.[76]

The bill also allocates funds for rural communities and forestland, including $20 billion to invest in climate-smart agriculture, $5 billion in forest conservation and urban tree planting and $2.6 billion to protect and restore coastal habitats.[76]

The bill should cut the global greenhouse gas emissions in a level similar to "eliminating the annual planet-warming pollution of France and Germany combined" and may help to limit the warming of the planet to 1.5 degrees - the target of the Paris Agreement.[82][83] With the bill and additional federal and state measures, the USA can fulfill its pledge in Paris agreement: 50% greenhouse gas emissions reduction by the year 2030.[26][27]

An assessment by the Rhodium Group, an independent research firm, estimated it would reduce national greenhouse gas emissions 32–42% below 2005 levels by 2030, compared to 24–35% under current policy while reducing household energy costs and improving energy security.[26] Furthermore, Rhodium Group projects that the nuclear provisions in the bill are likely to "keep much, if not all" of the nation's nuclear reactors that are at risk of retiring, estimated to be 22–38% of the fleet, online through the 2030s.[84]

A preliminary analysis by the REPEAT Project of Princeton University estimated that the investments made by the law would reduce net emissions 42% below 2005 levels, compared to 27% under current policies (including the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law).[85][86]

The nonpartisan Energy Innovation Group estimated the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions at 37–41% below 2005 levels in 2030, compared to 24% without the bill.[87][88] This estimate of the greenhouse gas emission reduction lines up with the figure provided by the bill's authors which is a 40% reduction in carbon emissions relative to 2005 levels.[89]

Modeling from the nonpartisan research institution Resources for the Future indicates the bill would decrease retail power costs by 5.2–6.7% over a ten-year period, resulting in savings of $170–220 per year for the average U.S. household. Also that the bill would tend to stabilize electricity prices.[90][91]

In reaction to the Supreme Court case West Virginia v. EPA, which limited the EPA's authority to institute a program such as the Obama-era Clean Power Plan, Title VI of the IRA amended the Clean Air Act to explicitly designate carbon dioxide, hydrofluorocarbons, methane, nitrous oxide, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride as air pollutants to unambiguously provide the EPA congressional authorization to regulate carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, as well as to promote renewable energy.[92][93]

In April 2023, Goldman Sachs estimated the bill will create 3 trillion dollars of climate investments in 2022-2032, from them 1.2 trillion in direct incentives. The bank estimated also what amounts will get different sectors. Especially big parts will receive power networks and buildings (efficiency, heat pumps). By 2050 the bill is expected to generate 11 trillion dollars in overall infrastructure investments.[94]

Adaptation to climate change

Biden's administration spent a lot of effort on flood management and increasing climate resilience as a whole especially in communities discriminated before.[95] In June 2023, $575 million were allocated to help coastal and Great Lakes communities, including Tribal communities, to adapt to climate change. The measures include protecting coastal ecosystems that protect communities from sea level rise, storm surge, and more. When Biden announced the allocation, he mentioned one of the nature reserves of California, saying: “These wetlands act as a critical buffer between the rising tides and the communities at risk”[96][97]

In 2023 an agreement between seven states was achieved, aiming to preserve the Colorado River water system from collapse due to poor management and climate change. The country is heavily depending on this river. Some states will reduce water use, receiving compensation for it ($1.2 billion), from the federal government. Many other projects for preserving the river like water recycling, rain harvesting, are advanced. The funding is coming from the Bipartisan infrastructure bill and the Inflation Reduction Act.[98][99]

Domestic action

In May 2022 the White House Council on Environmental Quality released a report in which it describes how Biden's administration followed the around 200 recommendations of the White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council. The full report has around 150 pages. The report summarizes many of the steps taken by the administration in the environmental domain. Among others, it mentions:[95]

Climate-related financial and green marketing regulation

In February 2021, Acting U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Allison Lee announced that the SEC would open a review of climate-related disclosures for public companies to update regulatory guidance the agency issued in 2010 for such disclosures.[100][101] In March 2021, the SEC announced that examination of regulatory compliance related to disclosures for climate change and environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) would be an area of focus for the agency in 2021,[102][103][104][105] and the SEC also announced the creation of a task force to pursue enforcement cases against investment fund managers and public companies for deceptive marketing for ESG investment funds and for false or misleading statements in climate risk disclosures.[106] In the same month, the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) of the U.S. Labor Department announced that it would review and not enforce a Trump administration final rule for fiduciaries in proxy voting under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to consider pecuniary interests only and not ESG factors in investments for 401(k)s pursuant to Executive Order 13990,[107][108][109] while Acting Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chair Rostin Behnam announced the formation of an agency interdivisional unit to assess the impact of climate risks on futures, options, and other derivatives markets.[110][111]

In August 2021, the SEC and the Eastern New York U.S. Attorney's Office were reportedly investigating the DWS Group (the asset management division of Deutsche Bank) after its former chief sustainability officer leaked internal emails and company presentations to The Wall Street Journal that showed that the company had overstated its ESG investment efforts.[112][113][114] In remarks made by video conference to the European Parliament Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs in September 2021, SEC Chair Gary Gensler stated that the agency was preparing recommendations for new disclosure requirements for ESG investment funds,[list 1] while the SEC released a list of letters sent to the chief financial officers of certain public companies to request that the companies provide greater information to investors about climate risks to financial earnings or business operations.[120] In October 2021, EBSA proposed reversing the Trump administration ERISA final rule for fiduciaries in proxy voting on ESG investments for 401(k)s,[121][122] while the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) released a report pursuant to Executive Order 14030 that identified climate change as an emerging and increasing threat to the stability of the U.S. financial system.[123][124][125]

In November 2021, the SEC rescinded a Trump administration rule issued in 2017 that permitted company managers to exclude ESG proposals from shareholders in annual proxy statements,[126][127][128] while Acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael J. Hsu stated at a conference hosted by The Wall Street Journal for sustainable business that climate risk guidance for bank stress tests issued by his office would be consistent with stress test principles proposed by the Network for Greening the Financial System.[129] In December 2021, the U.S. Justice Department informed Deutsche Bank that it may have violated its deferred prosecution agreement from the previous January for failing to inform prosecutors of their former chief sustainability officer's internal complaint about the DWS Group's overstating of its ESG investment efforts.[130][131] In the same month, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) released a draft regulatory guidance statement to banks for identifying climate risks and for climate risk management (CRM).[132][133][134] In March 2022, Deutsche Bank agreed to extend the term of an external compliance monitor until February 2023 from its 2015 settlement with the Justice Department to address its failure to disclose the internal ESG complaint from its former chief sustainability officer the previous August.[135]

Also in March 2022, the SEC approved a rules proposal to require the disclosure of climate risks, CRM policies, and carbon footprint accounting (including the use of carbon offsets) by public companies in 10-K forms and other SEC filings pursuant to Sections 7, 10, 19(a), and 28 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 3(b), 12, 13, 15, 23(a), and 36 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.[list 2] In May 2022, the SEC extended the public comment window for its climate risk and carbon footprint disclosure rules proposal until June 17, 2022,[146][147] and proposed two rules changes to ESG investment fund qualifications to prevent greenwashing marketing practices and to increase disclosure requirements for achieving ESG impacts.[list 3] In June 2022, the CFTC issued a request for information to solicit public comment until October 7, 2022, to inform the agency's response to the recommendations made in the October 2021 FSOC report on climate-related financial risk and hosted a convening for voluntary carbon market participants to discuss improving the credibility of carbon credits,[list 4] while the SEC was reportedly investigating the ESG investment funds of Goldman Sachs for potential greenwashing.[158]

In August 2022, Section 60111 in Title VI of the Inflation Reduction Act appropriated $5 million to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) created under the Clean Air Act in 2009 to support enhanced standardization and transparency of corporate greenhouse gas emission reduction commitment plans and interim targets and to support corporations progress towards implementing such plans and meeting such commitments.[159][160] In testimony before the U.S. Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee in September 2022, SEC Chair Gary Gensler stated that public companies subject to the carbon footprint disclosure rule would not be required to solicit carbon footprint accounting from their small business suppliers,[161][162][163][164] while the OCC announced the appointment of a chief climate risk officer who would report directly to the Comptroller.[165] In October 2022, the SEC announced that it would re-open the public comment windows for the climate risk and carbon footprint disclosure rules proposal and for the ESG disclosure rules proposal due to a technical error with the SEC public comment internet submission form.[166][167]

In November 2022, EBSA announced a final rule removing the Trump administration pecuniary interest only requirement for fiduciaries in proxy voting under ERISA when considering ESG investments for 401(k)s,[168][169][170] while Goldman Sachs agreed to pay $4 million to settle the SEC investigation of the company's ESG funds for greenwashing without admitting or denying guilt of the SEC's allegations.[171] In December 2022, the OCC chief climate risk officer stated at a conference hosted by Ceres that the OCC climate risk regulatory guidance for banks was issued to encourage banking institutions to adopt CRM policies and not to promote carbon neutrality pledges,[172] while Title I of Division HH of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 enacted the Growing Climate Solutions Act requiring the U.S. Department of Agriculture to evaluate and make a determination of whether to create a Greenhouse Gas Technical Assistance Provider and Third-Party Verifier Program that would create a voluntary registry for private businesses, non-profit organizations, or public agencies that act as third-party verifiers of carbon credits for agricultural or forestry carbon offset projects with standardized registration qualifications for participating entities and standardized protocols for ensuring the transparency of carbon credits verified by the registered entities in the program.[list 5]

Also in December 2022, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it was seeking public comment until February 21, 2023, for potential revisions to agency guidelines made pursuant to Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 for preventing deceptive green marketing practices for claims about carbon offsets, compostability, biodegradability, oxo-biodegradability, photodegradability, ozone safety, recyclability, recycled content, energy use and energy efficiency, organic products, and sustainability.[list 6] In January 2023, the FTC extended the public comment window for the revisions to its green marketing guidelines until April 24, 2023,[187] while the Federal Reserve announced that the six largest U.S. banks (Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo) would have until July 31, 2023, to complete a pilot climate scenario exercise analysis of climate risks to their loan portfolios and commercial real estate holdings in the Northeastern United States.[188][189]

In February 2023, the SEC Division of Examinations announced that oversight of ESG investment funds would be among six top priorities for the agency in 2023,[190] while SEC Chair Gary Gensler stated in an interview that the agency was making adjustments to the climate risk and carbon footprint disclosure rule proposed the previous March after the agency received nearly 15,000 public comments on the rule proposal.[191][192][193] In March 2023, in the first veto of his administration, Biden rejected a bill passed by the 118th United States Congress on party-line votes to overturn the EBSA ERISA 401(k) fiduciary proxy voting rule for ESG investments finalized the previous November,[194][195][196][197] while SEC Chair Gary Gensler suggested in an interview with the Council of Institutional Investors that the Scope 3 emissions disclosure requirement included in the climate risk and carbon footprint disclosure rules proposal could be scaled back due to Scope 3 emissions accounting being less well-developed, and stated that the climate risk and carbon footprint disclosure rules proposal had received the largest number of public comments for a rule proposal in the agency's history.[list 7]

Also in March 2023, the FTC announced that it would host a workshop about recycling marketing claims as part of its review for its green marketing guidelines on May 23, 2023.[list 8] In April 2023, SEC Chair Gary Gensler testified before the U.S. House Financial Services Committee on the climate risk and carbon footprint disclosure rules proposal,[216][217] while in remarks made at an event hosted by the Bipartisan Policy Center, CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam stated that the CFTC has the clear legal authority to oversee the carbon credits market to prevent securities fraud and market manipulation (as carbon credits are financial derivatives of an underlying commodity) but not to establish standards for carbon credit registries, and that the CFTC was considering hosting a second convening for voluntary carbon market participants later in the year before formulating an agency policy on carbon credits.[list 9] In June 2023, the CFTC announced that it would host a second convening the following month and the CFTC Whistleblower Office announced that it was seeking tips for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act in carbon credit markets.[224][225][226] In September 2023, SEC Chair Gary Gensler stated in testimony before the Senate Banking Committee that agency staff was reviewing the public comments on the climate risk and carbon footprint accounting rule proposal with a particular focus on Scope 3 reporting and reiterated that the proposed rule would apply only to public companies.[227][228]

CCS and CDR industry policies

In February 2021, the Biden administration announced that it would steer $30 billion in farm aid from the Commodity Credit Corporation to farmers implementing regenerative farming practices (e.g. carbon farming) to enhance carbon sequestration.[229][230] Under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act that Biden signed into law in November 2021, a $12 billion appropriation was made for carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) projects.[231] In May 2022, the U.S. Department of Energy announced a $3.5 billion program funded under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to create four large-scale regional direct air capture (DAC) hubs each consisting of a network of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) projects.[232][233] Under the CHIPS and Science Act that Biden signed into law in August 2022, a $1 billion appropriation was included to fund CDR research, development, and deployment.[234] Under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that Biden also signed into law in August 2022, a $20 billion appropriation was made to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) for oversubscribed programs (including the Environmental Quality Incentives Program and the Conservation Stewardship Program) to assist farmers with conservation practices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to increase carbon sequestration in soil and trees (and other climate-smart agricultural practices).[235][236]

Also, the IRA authorized the creation of the Energy Infrastructure Reinvestment (EIR) Program, a $5 billion loan guarantee program for projects to repurpose shuttered fossil fuel energy production facilities for clean energy production or to update existing energy production facilities with emissions control technologies including CCS,[237] and also increased the Section 45Q federal tax credit for CCS projects to $85 per metric ton of CO2 sequestered from $50 per ton and for DAC projects to $180 per metric ton of permanent CDR from $50 per ton, while the tax credit for the use of captured CO2 for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) or other uses was increased to $60 per metric ton from $35 per metric ton for CCS and to $130 per metric ton from $35 per metric ton for DAC.[238][239][240][241] In October 2022, the Global CCS Institute (of which the U.S. Department of Energy is a member organization) released a report on the global status of CCS projects that stated that there were 13 operational projects, 68 projects in development, and 2 projects with suspended operations in the United States (among 61 new CCS projects that had been announced over the previous year and 196 projects that were operational or in development worldwide in total).[242][243][244]

Energy efficiency

The executive order requiring federal agencies to cut emissions issued on 8 December 2021 contained measures about energy efficiency (sections 205, 206, 605).[245]

By the end of the year 2021, the Joe Biden administration reversed some of the rules established under Trump that reduced energy efficiency, but many of them remained in place.[246]

The administration released unprecedented funding for energy efficiency and weatherization. The Weatherization Assistance Program alone gave 3.5 billion dollars for the effort, resulting in 700,000 low-income households that increased energy efficiency and paid less for energy. 8.7 billion dollars were spent through the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). This program primarily helped households with children, elderly individuals, and people with disabilities.[95]

In June 2022, Biden announced a new initiative for increasing energy efficiency in buildings, reducing payment for energy in households at the same time. At least 225 million dollars were scheduled to be spent on it.[247]

In February 2023 the United States Department of Energy proposed a set of new energy efficiency standards that, if implemented, will save to users of different electric machines in the United States around $3,500,000,000 per year and will reduce by the year 2050 carbon emissions by the same amount as emitted by 29,000,000 houses.[248]

In October 2023 the Senate in a bipartisan vote rejected a proposal that could hurt policies promoting energy efficiency in houses. An opponent of the proposal argued the policies can save to a homeowner $15,000 in average.[249][250] The amount of money expected to be saved is not uniform but depend on climate zone. The report that calculated the gains divided the country into 8 zones from very hot and humid climate (zone 1) to subarctic and arctic (zone 8). The whole life cycle savings vary "from as low as $7,536 in Climate Zone 2, to a high of $46,836 in Climate Zone 8."[251]

Land and ocean conservation

Biden's administration set a goal of protecting 30% of the land and the water of the US. Currently, 12% of land and 26% of water are protected. The plan for achieving the target is called "America the Beautiful" and include many measures like expanding urban green spaces and collaboration with indigenous people.[252][253] The initiative includes $1 billion in grants for community-based conservation and restoration projects.[254]

In October 2021, President Biden announced the expansion of Bears Ears National Monument, Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument, and Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument, restoring the original areas and protections that were reduced by President Trump.[255]

President Biden created Camp Hale–Continental Divide National Monument in 2022 and Avi Kwa Ame National Monument and Castner Range National Monument in 2023.[256]

In March 2023, Biden directed the Department of Commerce to designate the Pacific Remote Islands as a National Marine Sanctuary, expanding the protections of Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument.[256]

Biden's administration launched a plan for protecting the oceans called "Ocean Climate Action Plan". It includes measures for protecting and restoring many marine and coastal ecosystems, stopping climate change with the help of these ecosystems and helping communities depending on them.[257]

According to a report from the Center for American Progress, the administration of Joe Biden reached a record in conservation. In 3 years of ruling it conserved or in the process of conserving more than 24 millions acres of public land and in 2023 alone more than 12.5 million acres of public land became protected area. It is doing it together with the indigenouse people as 200 agreements of co-stewardship with them were signed in 2023 alone.[258]

Oil and gas pipelines

The Biden administration supports the Line 3 pipeline owned by the Canadian corporation Enbridge.[259] However, the pipeline was still facing significant resistance as of September 2021.[260]

In January 2021, President Biden halted further development of the Keystone Pipeline by way of an executive order, which also directed agencies to review and reverse more than 100 Trump administration actions on the environment.[6] In June 2021, the pipeline project was canceled. It was considered an environmental threat by environmentalists, indigenous peoples, and the Biden administration.[261]

Environmental reviews of projects

In January 2021, Biden took some actions to improve the link between science and the policies of his administration on environmental issues. It includes improving the environmental reviews of big projects before they are given approval according to the NEPA, improving the function of the Environmental Protection Agency, and reestablishing a scientific body to calculate the social cost of all greenhouse gases, not just carbon dioxide. He ordered a stop to the oil and gas drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, as well as stating that the voices of indigenous peoples should be taken into consideration in the process of approving projects. He has also begun the process of installing standards for methane emissions.[262]

In October 2021, the Biden administration filed an application for a mineral withdrawal which will put a hold on the development of a copper mine near Ely, Minnesota while the environmental impacts are studied. The proposed mine is located on the watershed of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, an area that is popular for canoeing, fishing, and hiking, and is the country's most visited wilderness area. The Obama administration had launched a similar study but 24 weeks into the 28 week study the newly elected Trump administration ended it, allowing the plans for the mining operation to continue. The completed study could lead to a 20-year ban on mining upstream from the BWCAW.[263][264]

In April 2022, the Biden administration restored components of an environmental law (NEPA) from the 1970s that were abolished by Trump, requiring consideration of climate impacts and local community interests before approving major projects.[265]

In the beginning of 2024 Biden's administration announced a pause in the approval of projects linked to the export of Liquefied natural gas (LNG) to countries which are not members of free trade agreements with the USA until the environmental impacts will be fully reviewed. As a result, a number of projects linked with very high amounts of greenhouse gas emissions can be canceled. The climate movement hailed the decision and a planned protest of environmentalists was canceled. But Republicans and the fossil fuel industry supports the projects, saying they are needed for the US economy and security, especially due to the War in Ukraine (2022). The USA is currently the biggest producer and consumer of oil and gas and recently became the biggest gas exporter among other supplying gas to European countries which want to stop using Russian gas. While some scientists said LNG is better than coal other argue it is worse, due to high methane emissions. The USA LNG export capacity is expected to be two times bigger in 2027 due to already approved projects.[266][267][268]

Drilling on public lands

One week after becoming president, Biden signed several executive orders aimed at combatting climate change and protecting the environment. He ordered the Interior Secretary to stop new oil and gas drilling in federal lands and water, and a review of existing projects. However, these pauses were only temporary and didn't stop drilling permanently.[7] Another order sets a target of protecting 30% of United States lands and waters by 2030, as well as set in motion the creation of a plan for climate financing and a climate target for the United States. Biden also signed a presidential memorandum establishing a process for documenting any instances in which "improper political interference" interfered with research or distorted data.[269] Biden also increased the social cost of carbon to $51, the price that had been set by the Obama administration but had been slashed to $7 by Trump.[270]

In response to the reviews, the Interior Department stopped many of the oil and gas drilling projects, took measures for the protection of wild animals, and restored national monuments. It is also preparing a review of the entire oil and gas leasing program of the United States.[271] However, the Biden administration does support an oil drilling project, known as "Willow", which was approved by the Trump administration. This decision was criticized by environmentalists.[272]

In early June 2021, the Interior Department suspended all oil and gas leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. This national wildlife refuge includes around 20 million acres where snowy owls, caribou and other endangered wildlife lives.[273] Days later, a federal court issued a temporary injunction against the Interior Department action, pending litigation filed by more than a dozen states.[274]

Attorneys general from Republican states successfully sued to lift the suspension that Biden had placed on the selling of federal gas and oil leases and on September 17 energy companies including Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell bid $192 million for drilling rights on federal gas and oil reserves in the Gulf of Mexico. In November 2021, it was reported that the Biden administration was preparing lease some 80 million acres to gas and oil drilling companies. More than 250 indigenous, social justice, and environmental groups wrote a letter to the Biden administration asking Biden to keep his promise to end new leases on public waters and lands and stop the sale which they believe "makes a mockery" of the climate commitments made at COP26. The lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico was further criticized after the Department of Justice debunked the justification that the sale was legally required by the June 2021 ruling blocking the pause on oil leases.[275][276]

In January 2022, a federal judge remanded the lease auction back to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management for relying on a distorted Trump-era environmental impact assessment.[277][278] The administration also proposed another round of gas and oil lease sales in 2022, in Colorado, Montana, Wyoming, and other western states.[279][280]

In February 2022, the Biden administration suspended any further oil and gas leases on public lands. The decision came after a Trump-appointed judge reversed the social cost of carbon of $51 per ton, the figure established by Obama and restored by Biden, back to $7 per ton which had been Trump's cost estimate. The reversal was a result of a suit by 10 Republican attorneys general.[270]

In May 2022 the administration abolished 3 leases in the Mexican Gulf and Alaska. One of the reasons was "a lack of industry interest".[281]

Renewable energy

In his proposed 2022 budget,[needs update] the Biden Administration has proposed a $10 billion investment in clean energy research and development, an increase of 30%. The budget also proposes $2 billion to be invested in green energy projects, as well as setting aside reserves of $6.5 billion to lend to communities to lend to rural communities in support of additional green energy, power storage, and transmission projects.[16] Biden has ordered the amount of energy produced from offshore wind turbines to be doubled by 2030.[17]

In April 2023, the Biden administration announced that it would make $450 million in funding available through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act for clean energy demonstration projects in coal mining communities to convert current and former mines into clean energy projects, as well as $16 million in funding to the University of North Dakota and West Virginia University to create design studies for a full-scale refinery facility to extract and separate rare-earth elements and other minerals (including those needed in electric vehicle batteries) from coal ash, acid mine drainage, and other mine waste.[282][283]

Nuclear energy

$6.6 billion is provided in the new infrastructure law to keep older nuclear power plants from being prematurely decommissioned.[73] Biden initiatives fully fund two new reactor demonstration projects, X-energy and TerraPower.[284]

Fossil fuel subsidies

The Biden administration has delivered a tax plan to congress that aims to start winding back fossil fuel subsidies, replacing the subsidies with incentives to start producing green energy.[15] It is estimated that ending tax subsidies for those companies could save the American taxpayer $121 billion over the course of the next decade.[285] He has also stated his ambition to make the United States' power sector completely free of fossil fuels by 2035, and will bring a law to congress with a legal commitment to make the grid 80% clean by 2030.[286] He has also made a commitment to ensure that all federal vehicles are electric. In a series of executive orders at the beginning of his presidency, Biden ordered an increase in the production of renewable energy on federal lands and water, the creation of the Civilian Climate Corps, and making the fossil fuel companies responsible for repairing faults that lead to environmental damage. As a part of a commitment to environmental justice, he also stated that 40% of all climate investments will be sent to the most historically vulnerable communities, and created a special body for dealing with the issue, the White House Environmental Justice Interagency Council.[287]

Deforestation and wildlife

On the first day of his presidency, the Biden administration ordered a broad review of Trump-era policies pertaining to wildlife in the United States, including the gutting of the Migratory Birds Treaty Act and his decision to strip a number of animals, including gray wolves and the northern spotted owl, of their protections under the Endangered Species Act.[5] In June 2021, the Biden administration announced that they were beginning the process of restoring and strengthening wildlife protections that were loosened under the Trump Administration,[288] mainly in regards to the weakening of protections granted to endangered animals under the Endangered Species Act, and the extent to which their habitats have to be protected.[289] In June 2022, the Biden administration restored a rule that broadened the definition of a “critical habitat” and allowed more protection of endangered species.[290] This reversed a rule that Trump put into place right before leaving office, which limited the definition of a “critical habitat” to areas that could have sustained endangered species at the time, excluding places that could potentially sustain them in the future.[291]

In November 2021, Biden promised to end and reverse deforestation and land degradation by 2030,[4] in the COP26 climate summit's first major agreement.[292][293] In the same month, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network issued an advisory to financial institutions to increase scrutiny of financial transactions potentially tied to wildlife trafficking, illegal logging, and illegal fishing and the advisory was the first in the agency's history to prevent environmental crimes.[294]

Transportation

The transportation sector is the biggest emitter of CO2 in the United States,[295] and reducing transportation emissions will require a large-scale transition to carbon-free transportation. Biden promised to give all cities with populations greater than 100,000 people good public transport with low carbon options. United States Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg is expected to work toward achieving the goals, but nothing had been put into action as of June 2021.[14] Biden plans to increase the use of "zero carbon" transport, including cycling and walking.[296]

In August 2021, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed new light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards for Model Years 2023 through 2026. The 2023 target would call for a 9.8% reduction over the 2022 target with subsequent year-over-year reductions of approximately 5%.[297]

In December 2021, the new greenhouse gas emissions standards for vehicles were adopted. They were 6% stronger than the original proposition made in August and were estimated to prevent the emission of 3.1 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere. The benefits of the new standards overpass the cost by 190 billion dollars, including savings on fuel, reduction of the impacts of climate change and air pollution.[298] According to the EPA the reduction is "equivalent to more than half the total U.S. CO2 emissions in 2019".[299] The rules should cut the emissions from passenger cars and trucks (17% of the US greenhouse gas emissions) by 5%-10% in the years 2023–2026.[300]

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act includes:

  • $7.5 billion to build a national network of electric vehicle chargers
  • $5 billion for a "Clean School Bus Program"
  • $350 million for new wildlife crossings and corridors pilot project
  • $250 million for an electric or low-emissions ferry pilot program
  • $250 million to reduce truck idling at ports

Biden's administration promoted transit-oriented development, walking, cycling, mixed-use development among other by creating community-based Transport hubs. This was done mainly in low income neighborhoods. 1 billion dollars will be spent on reconnecting neighborhoods.[95]

In April 2023, the EPA proposed new tailpipe emissions limits that the agency estimated could require 67 percent of all new automobiles sold in the United States to be electric by 2032 (surpassing the previous commitment by the Biden administration under Executive Order 14037 for electric cars to make up 50 percent of new automobile sales by 2030).[301][302][303]

In November 2023 a new federal rule was adopted, requiring local authorities to measure GHG emissions from transportation and to prepare a plan how to reduce them, with concrete targets, by 1 February 2024. Progress will be measured every 2 years. Support of EV use, walking and cycling, prioritize maintenance of existing roads on behalf of building new, can help to achieve the needed reduction. Some states cheered the new rule while some opposed it. The Federal Highway Administrator Shailen Bhatt expressed hope for overall support saying that climate disasters become more frequent and his agency received requests for help around 1 billion dollars worth due to such disasters in 1 year.[304]

Agriculture

Biden pledged to cut emissions from the agriculture sector in the US by 50% by 2030. In February 2022 the United States Department of Agriculture begun to implement a program designed to cut greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector in the US. The sector accounts for over 10% of the overall emissions. The program includes a 1 billion dollars spendings on methods like No-till farming, Crop rotation, Carbon capture and storage, Manure management and Rotational grazing. The program includes measures regarding Forests. The agriculture sector in the USA has already heavily suffered from different impacts of climate change.[305][306] In October 2023, the Senate approved 8.5 million$ to Urban agriculture.[307]

Indigenous people

The administration spent many efforts on enhancing cooperation with the Indigenous peoples of the Americas, among others, by creating a consultation mechanism for assuring their voice will be heard for environmental justice initiatives. Different tribes and villages received help in protection from different effects of climate change.[95]

The Biden administration provided a total of 120 million dollars to support tribes impacted by the effects of climate change. The funding consists of $25 million from the annual allocations for fiscal year 2023, $72 million from the Inflation Reduction Act, and $23 million from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The program covers a variety of initiatives, including planning for climate adaptation, drought management, wildland fire mitigation measures, community-driven relocation and management of the ocean and coastline.[308][309]

On October 8, 2021, President Joe Biden delivered the first-ever presidential proclamation of Indigenous Peoples' Day, providing the most substantial boost yet to efforts to redirect the federal holiday commemorating Christopher Columbus toward an appreciation of Indigenous people. On the same day, the Biden Administration unveiled its plans to restore land for two significant national monuments in Utah that Trump had stripped of protections. One of them, Bears Ears, is situated on what Indigenous tribes recognize as sacred ground.[310]

International climate action

Paris climate agreement

John Kerry (right), U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, and his Russian counterpart Ruslan Edelgeriyev in Moscow on July 12, 2021[28]

Upon his first hours in office on January 20, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order bringing the United States back into the Paris Climate Agreement, after President Trump announced the country's withdrawal in 2017.[311] The move was welcomed by environmental groups and by the Union of Concerned Scientists.[48][312]

The Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres, congratulated Biden, stating that with the United States rejoining the agreement, the countries responsible for two-thirds of the global greenhouse gas emission will have made pledges to become carbon neutral. Without the United States, it was only half.[313] President of France Emmanuel Macron congratulated Biden saying, 'Welcome back to the Paris Agreement!'[31]

In February 2021, The United States officially rejoined the Paris Agreement. Speaking about the occasion, John Kerry mentioned the urgent need to act on climate change in the next 10 years, the impact that climate change will have on the future, and the impacts that it is already having, such as the latest extreme cold events in the USA that in his opinion is "related to climate because the polar vortex penetrates further south because of the weakening of the jet stream related to warming." This opinion is shared by many climate scientists.[314][315]

One week after Biden became president, he also began the process of creating a special plan for providing financial help for low-income countries in addressing issues related to climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation.[287]

In February 2021, Biden issued an order to begin the process of identification of climate refugees and finding ways to help those people.[316][317]

The Biden administration is urging China to speed up its commitment to becoming carbon neutral, with John Kerry saying that its pledge to reach net-zero emissions by 2060 is "not good enough".[318]

International climate summit

On the 22–23 April 2021, Biden hosted a virtual climate summit with 40 world leaders, organised by the administration.[19]

At the summit, Biden announced a new target for the US, previously having no Nationally Determined Contribution due to their withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. The new target aims to reduce GHG emissions by 50% - 52% by 2030 relative to the level of 2005, the amount specified by experts to adequately limit temperature rise.[319] The new target is described as a considerable step forward in the fight against climate change, although still not enough to limit global temperature rise to under the 1.5 degrees target. Overall, the commitments made at the summit reduce the gap between the government's current pledges and the 1.5 degrees target by 12% - 14%. If the pledges are accomplished, global emissions by 2030 will fall by 2.6% - 3.7% GtCO2e more than they would have with the pledges before the summit.[320]

At the beginning of May 2021, Climate Action Tracker released a more detailed report about the significance of the summit. According to the report, the summit, together with other pledges made from September 2020, reduce the expected rise in temperature by 2100 by 0.2 degrees. If all pledges are fulfilled, temperatures will rise by 2.4 °C, compared to the 2.9 °C increase that would arise from business-as-usual. In the most optimistic scenario, if the countries also fulfill the pledges that are not part of the Paris Agreement, temperatures will rise by 2.0 °C.[321][322]

Biden's administration also launched a number of coalitions and initiatives aimed at stopping climate change and helping to reduce its impacts. These include a Global Climate Ambition Initiative for helping low-income countries to achieve emissions targets and a "Net-Zero Producers Forum, with Canada, Norway, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, together representing 40% of global oil and gas production"[323]

IPCC and United Nations climate summits

John Kerry joins Joe Biden at the First Movers Coalition of COP26

In November 2021, world leaders met at the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) to negotiate goals to reduce global warming. While there was some progress, it is believed that the agreements reached are not sufficient to avoid the worst damage.[324]

Developing countries, which have already faced hardships due to intense droughts and flooding, asked that developed countries, largely responsible for global warming, establish a fund to help them cope. The more well-to-do nations, including the U.S., refused.

One of the successes of the conference was the US - China agreement on fighting climate change together. The framework includes commitments to:

  • Working for achieving halt in temperature rise on 2 and preferably 1.5 degrees, global Carbon neutrality.
  • Establishing environmental standards and policies needed for the transition to clean economy.
  • Moving toward Circular economy.
  • Control and reduce Methane emissions. China will adopt a national methane reduction plan as the U.S. has already done. In the first half of 2022 both countries will convene a meeting to accelerate the process.
  • Increase Energy efficiency and usage of Renewable energy. The U.S. will make its electricity sector, carbon pollution-free by 2035.
  • Working to stop globally the use of unabated thermal coal power generation. China will lower the use of coal how much it can during the 15th Five Year Plan.
  • Working to stop illegal deforestation by stopping illegal imports.
  • Giving financial and capacity building help to other countries.
  • Submitting new NDC to the year 2035 by 2025.
  • Create a special body: ""Working Group on Enhancing Climate Action in the 2020s," that will coordinate the implementation of this agreement.[325]

At the conference, 40 countries, including the U.S. and five institutions promised to stop financing carbon intensive projects abroad by the end of the year 2022.[326]

At the conference US and UAE launched an initiative named "the Agriculture Innovation Mission for Climate (AIM for Climate)". In February 2022 the US gave 1 billion dollars to GHG emissions, cutting from its agricultural sector what can be considered as part of the implementation. The initiative needs another 8 billion dollars for being implemented as well.[327]

Bilateral climate issues

The Biden administration ended the U.S.-China Clean Energy Research Center (CERC) established under Obama.[328]: 98  CERC had been the most ambitious clean energy cooperation platform between the two countries,[328]: 117  and one of the few cooperation mechanisms to have survived the Trump administration.[328]: 98 

International carbon accounting reporting standards

In July 2023, the International Organization of Securities Commissions, of which the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission are board members and whose members agencies regulate more than 95 percent of worldwide market capitalization, endorsed the climate reporting standards created by the International Sustainability Standards Board (including for Scope 3 reporting).[329]

Reception

Environmental organizations and scientists responded positively to the Biden administration's actions on climate change on the first day of his presidency.[262][48] The decisions taken one week later were similarly welcomed by environmental groups, like the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Sunrise Movement and partially by the Indigenous Environmental Network. However, the Western Energy Alliance filed a lawsuit against the decision to stop giving new permits for oil and gas drilling in federal lands and waters, whilst the Indigenous Environmental Network said that the decision did not go far enough.[287] There is also concern that the ban on new oil and gas drilling on public lands will not reduce greenhouse gas emissions because less than half of the existing permits are presently in use.[17]

Some have criticized Biden's environmental policies on the premise that they will eliminate jobs, a popular Republican argument against Biden in the 2020 election.[330] Biden has countered that his policies will actually create jobs in the transition to a green economy.[330] There is also the argument that climate change, if not acted upon, would cause the loss of many more jobs than any climate action on the part of the Biden Administration would.[331] According to Energy Innovation, a program aimed at reaching zero emissions by 2050, could save the U.S. 3.5 trillion dollars if it starts being implemented now, compared to a scenario in which it will begin to be implemented in 2030.[332]

The Biden administration's environmental policy has been characterized as a return to the Obama administration's climate change policy of reducing carbon emissions with the goal of conserving the environment for future generations. However, according to a letter sent to the administration by a group of young climate activists, returning to the policy of Obama and reaching carbon neutrality by 2050 will not be enough to stabilize the climate.[333] Others have criticized Biden's environmental policies for being too conservative, believing that they do not go far enough in comparison to policies put in place by politicians like the Green Party's Howie Hawkins, who created the original version of the Green New Deal, or Biden's primary rival Bernie Sanders.[334][335]

The attorney general of 21 Republican-led states sued Biden for canceling the permit to build the Keystone XL pipeline.[336] The attorney general of 14 Republican-led states sued him for the moratorium on new oil and gas leases on public lands and waters.[337] Many of those states suffer from severe, climate change induced, heat wave[338] and drought. Farmers are among the most affected.[339]

In February 2022, around 100 religious leaders called to Biden and Congress to pass the Build Back Better bill for protecting the climate. Those included Christians, Jews and others. Around 80% of Catholic woman are members in the organizations that signed the letter. One of them mentioned that the bill sets a spending of 555 billion dollars through several years while the Senate approved spending of 770 billion in 1 year for military tasks.[340]

References

  1. ^ Ritter, Bill (January 13, 2021). "Biden plans to fight climate change in a way no U.S. president has done before". The Conversation.
  2. ^ "Biden returns to Obama-era greenhouse gas calculation". The Hill. February 26, 2021.
  3. ^ a b "Biden cabinet: John Kerry named climate envoy as inner circle get key posts". BBC News. November 24, 2020. Retrieved June 18, 2021.
  4. ^ a b "Hoyer introduces $9B bill bolstering Biden's deforestation vow at COP26". The Hill. November 3, 2021.
  5. ^ a b "Biden Administration Announces Major Steps to Protect Climate, Wildlife". Center for Biological Diversity. Retrieved July 6, 2021.
  6. ^ a b Bradner, Eric (January 20, 2021). "Biden targets Trump's legacy with first-day executive actions". CNN. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  7. ^ a b Rott, Nathan; Detrow, Scott; Wise, Alana (January 27, 2021). "Biden Hits 'Pause' On Oil And Gas Leasing On Public Lands And Waters". Retrieved March 4, 2021.
  8. ^ Goldfuss, Christy; Gout, Elise; Hardin, Sally (February 11, 2021). "How the Biden Administration Can Modernize Environmental Review". Center for American Progress. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
  9. ^ "The Biden Administration Environmental Agenda So Far". The National Law Review. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
  10. ^ Rice, Doyle; Voyles Pulver, Dinah (December 7, 2023). "Biden Administration announces first-ever Ocean Justice Strategy. What's that?". USA Today. Retrieved December 18, 2023.
  11. ^ OCEAN JUSTICE STRATEGY (PDF). OCEAN POLICY COMMITTEE. December 2023. p. 23. Retrieved December 18, 2023.
  12. ^ "Environmental Justice". The White House. Retrieved May 14, 2023.
  13. ^ Mukhtar, Mehr. "Three years in, what can Biden still accomplish for transportation?". Transportation For America. Retrieved February 12, 2024.
  14. ^ a b Denny, Emily (February 3, 2021). "What Does Pete Buttigieg's Transportation Secretary Role Mean for the Climate?". Ecowatch. Retrieved February 4, 2021.
  15. ^ a b Gardner, Timothy (April 7, 2021). "Biden tax plan replaces U.S. fossil fuel subsidies with clean energy incentives". Reuters. Retrieved July 1, 2021.
  16. ^ a b "Biden proposes more than $2B for clean energy infrastructure, $14B+ increase in climate spending". Utility Dive. Retrieved July 1, 2021.
  17. ^ a b c McGrath, Matt (January 28, 2021). "Biden signs 'existential' executive orders on climate and environment". BBC. Retrieved January 28, 2021.
  18. ^ Murphy, Ryan (January 27, 2021). "Pres. Biden Signs Executive Order to Double OSW by 2030". Business Network for Offshore Wind. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
  19. ^ a b Mahtani, Melissa; Wagner, Meg; Macaya, Mellisa (April 22, 2021). "These are the 40 world leaders that the US invited to today's summit". CNN. Retrieved April 22, 2021.
  20. ^ Pettypiece, Shannon (November 15, 2021). "Biden signs infrastructure bill marking victory in hard-fought legislative battle". NBC News. Archived from the original on November 15, 2021. Retrieved November 15, 2021.
  21. ^ A GUIDEBOOK TO THE BIPARTISAN INFRASTRUCTURE LAW FOR STATE, LOCAL, TRIBAL, AND TERRITORIAL GOVERNMENTS, AND OTHER PARTNERS (PDF). The White House. May 2022. Retrieved February 11, 2024.
  22. ^ Eilperin, Juliet; Dennis, Brady; Muyskens, John (July 21, 2022). "Tracking Biden's environmental actions". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 25, 2022.
  23. ^ a b c Vazquez, Maegan; Judd, Donald. "Biden signs Inflation Reduction Act into law". CNN. Archived from the original on August 16, 2022.
  24. ^ a b "CBO Scores IRA with $238 Billion of Deficit Reduction". Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. September 7, 2022. Retrieved September 25, 2022.
  25. ^ "The US is poised for an energy revolution". Goldman Sachs. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  26. ^ a b c d "A Turning Point for US Climate Progress: Assessing the Climate and Clean Energy Provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act". Rhodium Group. Retrieved August 16, 2022.
  27. ^ a b c MAHAJAN, MEGAN; ASHMOORE, OLIVIA; RISSMAN, JEFFREY; ORVIS, ROBBIE; GOPAL, ANAND (August 2022). MODELING THE INFLATION REDUCTION ACT USING THE ENERGY POLICY SIMULATOR (PDF). Energy innovation. p. 1. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
  28. ^ a b Weaver, Courtney (January 25, 2021). "The new Biden climate team — like the old Obama team". Financial Times. Retrieved February 2, 2021.
  29. ^ Friedman, Lisa (December 22, 2020). "Biden Introduces His Climate Team". The New York Times. The New York Times. Retrieved February 2, 2021.
  30. ^ "John Kerry, who signed Paris accord for US, is Biden's climate envoy". Euroactive, AFP. November 24, 2020. Retrieved February 2, 2021.
  31. ^ a b Choi, Joseph (January 20, 2021). "Macron to Biden and Harris: "Welcome back to the Paris Agreement!"". The Hill. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  32. ^ a b Quinn, Melissa (January 28, 2021). ""It's time to act": Biden rolls out new actions on climate change". CBC News. Retrieved January 28, 2021.
  33. ^ "World Scientist's Warning to Humanity" (PDF). Union of Concerned Scientists. Retrieved November 11, 2019.
  34. ^ Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F. (December 2017). "World Scientists' Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice". BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342.
  35. ^ Ripple, William J; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M; Barnard, Phoebe; Moomaw, William R (November 5, 2019). "World Scientists' Warning of a Climate Emergency". BioScience. biz088. doi:10.1093/biosci/biz088. hdl:2445/151800.
  36. ^ Germanos, Andrea (January 21, 2021). "Youth Climate Leaders Say Global Future Depends on Biden Being Bold". Ecowatch. Retrieved January 27, 2021.
  37. ^ Kaplan, Sarah; Grandoni, Dino (January 25, 2021). "One coal-state senator holds the key to Biden's ambitious climate agenda. And it's not McConnell".
  38. ^ Washington, District of Columbia 1800 I. Street NW; Dc 20006. "PolitiFact - Joe Biden's climate change plan, explained". @politifact. Retrieved February 13, 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  39. ^ Berardelli, Jeff (October 5, 2020). "How Joe Biden's climate plan compares to the Green New Deal". CBC News. Retrieved February 2, 2021.
  40. ^ "Biden's $2 trillion climate plan aims to reframe debate". ABC News. Retrieved June 23, 2021.
  41. ^ Urbanek, Lauren; Shahyd, Khalil (November 17, 2020). "Biden Plan Promises Better Buildings, for Climate and Equity". NRDC. Retrieved June 23, 2021.
  42. ^ "Joe Biden unveils aggressive $2tn climate and jobs plan". the Guardian. July 14, 2020. Retrieved June 23, 2021.
  43. ^ Freidman, Lisa (February 21, 2019). "What Is the Green New Deal? A Climate Proposal, Explained". The New York Times. Retrieved March 4, 2021.
  44. ^ Teale, Chris. "Green buildings 'unheralded hero' in emissions fight, experts say". Smart Cities Dive. Retrieved February 2, 2021.
  45. ^ "Climate measures in reconciliation, infrastructure bills will mostly meet Biden's emissions goals, Schumer says". CNN. August 25, 2021. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  46. ^ D'Angelo, Chris (September 23, 2021). "Biden Administration Finalizes Rule To Slash Super-Pollutant HFCs". HuffPost. Retrieved September 23, 2021.
  47. ^ Collins, Michael (December 8, 2021). "More electric vehicles, modern buildings: Biden aims to cut federal greenhouse gas emissions by 65%". USA today. Retrieved December 9, 2021.
  48. ^ a b c Sommer, Lauren (January 20, 2021). "Biden Moves Quickly On Climate Change, Reversing Trump Rollbacks". NPR. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  49. ^ "A Return to Science: Evidence-Based Estimates of the Benefits of Reducing Climate Pollution". The White House. February 26, 2021. Retrieved September 17, 2021.
  50. ^ Chemnick, Jean (March 1, 2021). "Cost of Carbon Pollution Pegged at $51 a Ton". Scientific American.
  51. ^ Meredith, Sam (May 18, 2021). "Why the world's largest carbon market is experiencing a boom like never before". CNBC. Retrieved June 22, 2021.
  52. ^ "Monitoring methane emissions from oil and gas operations" (PDF).
  53. ^ Showalter, Michael J. "Fifth Circuit Permits Biden Administration To Resume Use of Social Cost of Carbon Measure". National Law Review. Retrieved March 20, 2022.
  54. ^ Lo, Joe (January 19, 2022). "A for targets, D for action: Joe Biden's first year on climate, graded". Climate Home News. Retrieved January 26, 2022.
  55. ^ Preliminary Report: The Climate Impact of Congressional Infrastructure and Budget Bills (PDF). Rapid energy policy evaluation and analyzis tollkit. October 20, 2021. p. 9. Retrieved January 26, 2022.
  56. ^ "Fact Sheet: The Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal". The White House. November 6, 2021. Retrieved January 26, 2022.
  57. ^ a b Sprunt, Barbara (August 10, 2021). "Here's What's Included In The Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill". NPR. Retrieved August 11, 2021.
  58. ^ Romm, Tony (August 10, 2021). "Senate approves bipartisan, $1 trillion infrastructure bill, bringing major Biden goal one step closer". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 8, 2021.
  59. ^ Pramuk, Jacob (August 10, 2021). "Senate passes $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill, sending key part of Biden's economic agenda to the House". CNBC. Retrieved November 8, 2021.
  60. ^ Jalonick, Mary Clare (November 7, 2021). "Roads, transit, internet: What's in the infrastructure bill". Associated Press. Retrieved November 8, 2021.
  61. ^ Boak, Josh; Long, Colleen (November 16, 2021). "Biden signs $1T infrastructure deal with bipartisan crowd". Associated Press. Retrieved November 16, 2021.
  62. ^ Friedman, Lisa (August 22, 2022). "Democrats Designed the Climate Law to Be a Game Changer. Here's How". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 23, 2022.
  63. ^ Newburger, Emma (March 29, 2021). "Here's how Biden's infrastructure package will likely tackle climate change". CNBC. Retrieved May 11, 2021.
  64. ^ Waldman, Scott. "Biden Says Infrastructure Is the Pillar of His Climate Plan". Scientific American. Retrieved May 11, 2021.
  65. ^ Newburger, Emma (March 31, 2021). "Here's how Biden's $2 trillion infrastructure plan addresses climate change". CNBC. Retrieved May 11, 2021.
  66. ^ Sheffey, Ayelet (April 2, 2021). "Why green initiatives count as infrastructure, from Biden's top climate officials". Business Insider. Retrieved May 11, 2021.
  67. ^ "US Senate reaches compromise over Biden infrastructure plan". International Railway Journal. June 28, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
  68. ^ Snell, Kelsey (August 10, 2021). "The Senate Approves The $1 Trillion Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill In A Historic Vote". NPR. Retrieved August 11, 2021.
  69. ^ Breuninger, Kevin; Newburger, Emma (July 28, 2021). "Here's what's in the $550 billion bipartisan infrastructure deal". CNBC. Retrieved August 11, 2021.
  70. ^ Pettypiece, Shannon (November 15, 2021). "Biden signs infrastructure bill marking victory in hard-fought legislative battle". NBC News. Archived from the original on November 15, 2021. Retrieved November 15, 2021.
  71. ^ A GUIDEBOOK TO THE BIPARTISAN INFRASTRUCTURE LAW FOR STATE, LOCAL, TRIBAL, AND TERRITORIAL GOVERNMENTS, AND OTHER PARTNERS (PDF). The White House. May 2022. Retrieved February 11, 2024.
  72. ^ Jennifer A. Dlouhy and Ari Natter. (13 January 2022). "Manchin Just Gave Biden a Path for His Green Goals: 'I'm Big on Nuclear' ". Bloomberg website Retrieved 13 January 2022.
  73. ^ a b Staff. (16 November 2021). "Nuclear-supporting infrastructure bill becomes US law". World Nuclear News website Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  74. ^ Nilsen, Ella (July 28, 2022). "Clean energy package would be biggest legislative climate investment in US history". CNN. Retrieved July 31, 2022.
  75. ^ Tankersley, Jim (August 16, 2022). "Biden Signs Expansive Health, Climate and Tax Law". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 18, 2022.
  76. ^ a b c d e Democrats, Senate (July 27, 2022). "Summary of the Energy Security and Climate Change Investments in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022" (PDF). Senate Democrats. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
  77. ^ House, The White (August 15, 2022). "BY THE NUMBERS: The Inflation Reduction Act". The White House. Retrieved August 23, 2022.
  78. ^ Iacurci, Greg (August 13, 2022). "Consumers may qualify for up to $10,000 — or more — in climate tax breaks and rebates in the Inflation Reduction Act". CNBC. Retrieved September 8, 2022.
  79. ^ "FACT SHEET: Inflation Reduction Act Advances Environmental Justice". The White House. August 17, 2022. Retrieved September 14, 2022.
  80. ^ "How States and Cities Can Benefit From Climate Investments in the Inflation Reduction Act". Center for American Progress. August 25, 2022. Retrieved September 14, 2022.
  81. ^ Banayan, Noa. "What IS in the Inflation Reduction Act for Bikes?". People for Bikes. Retrieved September 14, 2022.
  82. ^ Rathi, Akshat; A Dlouhy, Jennifer (August 2022). "Bill Gates and the Secret Push to Save Biden's Climate Bill". Bloomberg. Retrieved September 19, 2022.
  83. ^ Hirji, Zahra; Roston, Eric (August 13, 2022). "US Climate Bill Keeps Hope Alive for Halting Warming at 1.5°C". Bloomberg. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
  84. ^ Natter, Ari (August 3, 2022). "Manchin Deal Tosses $30 Billion Lifeline to US Nuclear Reactors". Bloomberg. Retrieved August 4, 2022.
  85. ^ Ebbs, Stephanie. "Experts explain how the Inflation Reduction Act helps fight climate change". ABC News. Retrieved August 18, 2022.
  86. ^ princeton.edu (August 4, 2022). "Preliminary Report: The Climate and Energy Impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022" (PDF). repeatproject.org. Retrieved August 18, 2022.
  87. ^ "Modeling The Inflation Reduction Act Using The Energy Policy Simulator". Energy Innovation. Retrieved August 1, 2022.
  88. ^ Storrow, Benjamin. "How Much Will the Climate Bill Reduce Emissions? It Depends". Scientific American. Retrieved August 18, 2022.
  89. ^ Newburger, Emma (July 28, 2022). "Schumer-Manchin reconciliation bill has $369 billion to fight climate change — here are the details". CNBC. Retrieved August 1, 2022.
  90. ^ "Retail Electricity Rates under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022". Resources for the Future. Retrieved August 6, 2022.
  91. ^ "Axios Generate, August 5, 2022". Axios. Retrieved August 5, 2022.
  92. ^ Friedman, Lisa (August 22, 2022). "Democrats Designed the Climate Law to be a Game Changer. Here's How". The New York Times.
  93. ^ 136 Stat. 2063, Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law (United States) 117–169 (text) (PDF)
  94. ^ "The US is poised for an energy revolution". Goldman Sachs. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  95. ^ a b c d e "Biden-⁠Harris Administration Outlines Historic Progress on Environmental Justice in Report Submitted to Congress". The White House. May 23, 2022. Retrieved May 30, 2022.
  96. ^ Alvarado, Amanda (June 19, 2023). "Biden visits California nature center, discusses plans for climate change". The Associated Press. Live 5. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  97. ^ "FACT SHEET: Biden-⁠Harris Administration Makes Historic Investments to Build Community Climate Resilience". The White House. June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  98. ^ "Biden-Harris Administration Announces Historic Consensus System Conservation Proposal to Protect the Colorado River Basin". U.S. Department of the Interior. May 22, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  99. ^ Jones, Benji (May 23, 2023). "Why the new Colorado River agreement is a big deal — even if you don't live out West". Vox. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  100. ^ Holger, Dieter; Chin, Kimberly (February 24, 2021). "SEC Opens Review of Corporate Climate Change Disclosures". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  101. ^ Michaels, Dave (June 21, 2021). "SEC Wants More Climate Disclosures. Businesses Are Preparing for a Fight". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  102. ^ Michaels, Dave (March 3, 2021). "Climate Change Emerges as a Compliance Focus for SEC". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  103. ^ Tokar, Dylan (May 4, 2021). "Compliance Officers Play Growing Role in Corporate Sustainability Efforts". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  104. ^ Zhang, Natalie (June 25, 2020). "The rise of ESG investing". CNBC. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  105. ^ Patterson, Scott; Ramkumar, Amrith (May 22, 2021). "Green Finance Goes Mainstream, Lining Up Trillions Behind Global Energy Transition". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  106. ^ Michaels, Dave (March 4, 2021). "SEC to Hunt for Climate-Friendly Marketing That Misleads Investors". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  107. ^ Iacurci, Greg (March 10, 2021). "Biden administration won't enforce Trump-era ESG rule for 401(k) plans". CNBC. Retrieved November 23, 2022.
  108. ^ Holger, Dieter; Lim, Dawn (March 10, 2021). "Labor Department Holds Off Enforcement of ESG Rule for 401(k)s". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved November 23, 2022.
  109. ^ Holger, Dieter (October 30, 2020). "Labor Department Curbs Sustainable Investing in 401(k)s". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved November 23, 2022.
  110. ^ Holger, Dieter; Chin, Kimberly (March 17, 2021). "CFTC Creates Climate Risk Unit to Review Futures, Options". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
  111. ^ "CFTC Acting Chairman Behnam Establishes New Climate Risk Unit" (Press release). Commodity Futures Trading Commission. March 17, 2021. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
  112. ^ Kowsmann, Patricia; Ramey, Corinne; Michaels, Dave (August 25, 2021). "U.S. Authorities Probing Deutsche Bank's DWS Over Sustainability Claims". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 24, 2023.
  113. ^ Kowsmann, Patricia; Brown, Ken (August 1, 2021). "Fired Executive Says Deutsche Bank's DWS Overstated Sustainable-Investing Efforts". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 24, 2023.
  114. ^ Brown, Ken; Kowsmann, Patricia (September 25, 2021). "At Deutsche Bank's DWS, Issues With Data Were at Heart of Sustainable-Investing Problems". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  115. ^ Kiernan, Paul (September 1, 2021). "SEC Considers Asking Funds for Criteria Used to Tout Sustainability". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 24, 2023.
  116. ^ Gensler, Gary (September 1, 2021). Remarks before the European Parliament Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (Speech). Washington, D.C. Retrieved April 24, 2023.
  117. ^ Shifflett, Shane (June 11, 2021). "How ESG Stocks Perform Depends on Who Ranks Them". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  118. ^ Shifflett, Shane (August 10, 2021). "How the WSJ Compared ESG Ratings". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  119. ^ Shifflett, Shane (September 9, 2021). "Funds Go Green, but Sometimes in Name Only". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  120. ^ Kiernan, Paul (September 22, 2021). "SEC Asks Dozens of Companies for More Climate Disclosures". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  121. ^ Tergesen, Anne (October 13, 2021). "ESG Funds Easier for 401(k)s to Buy Under Labor Department Plan". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  122. ^ Dore, Kate (October 15, 2021). "Labor Department proposes reversing Trump-era rules on socially conscious investing". CNBC. Retrieved November 23, 2022.
  123. ^ Newburger, Emma (October 21, 2021). "U.S. government agency in charge of financial stability weighs in on climate change risks". CNBC. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  124. ^ "Financial Stability Oversight Council Identifies Climate Change as an Emerging and Increasing Threat to Financial Stability" (Press release). U.S. Treasury Department. October 21, 2021. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  125. ^ Report on Climate-Related Financial Risk 2021 (PDF) (Report). U.S. Treasury Department. October 21, 2021. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  126. ^ Kiernan, Paul (November 3, 2021). "SEC Rescinds Trump-era Policy, Eases Path for Shareholder Proposals on Environmental, Social Issues". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  127. ^ Holger, Dieter (March 9, 2021). "More ESG Shareholder Proposals Could Reach Ballots Under New SEC Leadership". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  128. ^ Vanderford, Richard (February 11, 2022). "Shareholder Voices Poised to Grow Louder With SEC's Help". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  129. ^ Tokar, Dylan (November 17, 2021). "U.S. Climate Risk Guidance Will Be in Line With Global Principles, Bank Regulator Says". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  130. ^ Michaels, Dave; Kowsmann, Patricia (December 8, 2021). "Justice Department Told Deutsche Bank Lender May Have Violated Criminal Settlement". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  131. ^ Ramey, Corinne; Patrick, Margot (January 8, 2021). "Deutsche Bank to Pay $130 Million to Settle Federal Criminal and Civil Investigations". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  132. ^ Vanderford, Richard (December 16, 2021). "Climate Risks for Big Banks Could Hurt Financial System, OCC Says". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  133. ^ "Risk Management: Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Banks; Request for Feedback" (Press release). Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. December 16, 2021. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  134. ^ Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Banks (PDF) (Report). Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. December 16, 2021. Retrieved May 1, 2023.
  135. ^ Kowsmann, Patricia; Michaels, Dave (March 11, 2022). "Deutsche Bank Violates DOJ Settlement, Agrees to Extend Outside Monitor". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  136. ^ Pisani, Bob (March 21, 2022). "The SEC wants to know a lot more about what companies are doing about climate change". CNBC. Retrieved May 18, 2022.
  137. ^ Franck, Thomas (March 21, 2022). "SEC proposes broad climate rules as Chair Gensler says risk disclosure will help investors". CNBC. Retrieved May 18, 2022.
  138. ^ Kiernan, Paul (March 21, 2022). "SEC Floats Mandatory Disclosure of Climate-Change Risks, Emissions". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
  139. ^ Eaglesham, Jean (March 22, 2022). "New Rules Put Net Zero Pledges Under Scrutiny". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  140. ^ Maurer, Mark; Broughton, Kristin (March 22, 2022). "Companies Brace for Higher Compliance Costs as SEC Proposes Climate Disclosures". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  141. ^ Clifford, Catherine (March 23, 2022). "Who stands to make and lose money if the SEC climate rule becomes law". CNBC. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  142. ^ Vanderford, Richard (March 26, 2022). "SEC Climate Disclosure Proposal Looms as Litigation Risk". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  143. ^ "SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (17 CFR Part 210, 229, 232, 239, and 249 [Release Nos. 33–11042; 34–94478; File No. S7–10–22] RIN 3235–AM87) – The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors" (PDF). Federal Register. 87 (69). U.S. Government Publishing Office: 21334–21473. April 11, 2022. Retrieved May 9, 2023.
  144. ^ a b Shifflett, Shane (September 8, 2022). "Companies Are Buying Large Numbers of Carbon Offsets That Don't Cut Emissions". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
  145. ^ a b Holger, Dieter (January 17, 2023). "Many Companies Are Shying Away From Carbon Credits". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 30, 2023.
  146. ^ Kiernan, Paul (May 9, 2022). "SEC Extends Comment Periods on Three Major Rule Proposals". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  147. ^ Maurer, Mark (June 21, 2022). "Companies Skewer SEC's Climate-Disclosures Plan in Comment Letters". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  148. ^ Newburger, Emma (May 25, 2022). "SEC unveils rules to prevent misleading claims and enhance disclosures by ESG funds". CNBC. Retrieved June 8, 2022.
  149. ^ Kiernan, Paul (May 25, 2022). "SEC Proposes More Disclosure Requirements for ESG Funds". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 24, 2023.
  150. ^ "SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (17 CFR Parts 200, 230, 232, 239, 249, 274, and 279 [Release No. 33–11068; 34–94985; IA–6034; IC–34594; File No. S7–17–22] RIN 3235–AM96) – Enhanced Disclosures by Certain Investment Advisers and Investment Companies About Environmental, Social, and Governance Investment Practices" (PDF). Federal Register. 87 (117). U.S. Government Publishing Office: 36654–36761. June 17, 2022. Retrieved May 9, 2023.
  151. ^ Eaglesham, Jean (January 29, 2022). "Wall Street's Green Push Exposes New Conflicts of Interest". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  152. ^ Iacurci, Greg (June 5, 2022). "That socially responsible fund may not be as 'green' as you think. Here's how to pick one". CNBC. Retrieved May 1, 2023.
  153. ^ Shifflett, Shane (October 4, 2022). "Fund Managers, Regulators Wrestle Over Plans to Tighten ESG Rules". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  154. ^ "CFTC Releases Request for Information on Climate-Related Financial Risk" (Press release). Commodity Futures Trading Commission. June 2, 2022. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
  155. ^ "CFTC Announces Voluntary Carbon Markets Convening" (Press release). Commodity Futures Trading Commission. May 11, 2022. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
  156. ^ Dalton, Matthew; Deng, Chao; Niiler, Eric (November 9, 2022). "U.S. Plan to Ramp Up Carbon Credits Faces Doubts at COP27". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 30, 2023.
  157. ^ Ramkumar, Amrith; Shifflett, Shane (November 12, 2022). "Carbon Market Under Pressure to Deliver Billions in Climate Funding". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
  158. ^ Michaels, Dave (June 10, 2022). "SEC Is Investigating Goldman Sachs Over ESG Funds, Sources Say". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved June 10, 2022.
  159. ^ "Tackling Climate Pollution – US EPA". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. August 15, 2022. Retrieved May 9, 2023.
  160. ^ 136 Stat. 2072, Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law (United States) 117–169 (text) (PDF)
  161. ^ Vanderford, Richard (September 15, 2022). "SEC Climate Rule Won't Demand Extensive Reporting From Small Businesses, Gensler Says". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  162. ^ "Securities and Exchange Commission Oversight Hearing". C-SPAN. September 15, 2022. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  163. ^ Broughton, Kristin; Maurer, Mark (November 17, 2021). "Companies Push Suppliers to Disclose More Climate Data". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  164. ^ Vanderford, Richard (June 22, 2022). "Small Businesses Plead With SEC to Show Restraint on Climate Rules". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  165. ^ Vanderford, Richard (September 12, 2022). "U.S. Banking Regulator Appoints New Climate Risk Chief". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  166. ^ Holger, Dieter (October 13, 2022). "SEC Could Ease Up on Scope 3 Greenhouse-Gas Emission Reporting, WSJ Panelists Say". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  167. ^ "SEC Reopens Comment Periods for Several Rulemaking Releases Due to Technological Error in Receiving Certain Comments" (Press release). U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. October 7, 2022. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  168. ^ Iacurci, Greg (November 22, 2022). "Biden administration loosens Trump-era investing rules around environment, social and governance funds for 401(k) plans". CNBC. Retrieved November 23, 2022.
  169. ^ Tergesen, Anne (November 22, 2022). "Labor Department Clears Path for 401(k) Plans to Offer ESG Funds". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved November 23, 2022.
  170. ^ "DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employee Benefits Security Administration (29 CFR Part 2550 RIN 1210–AC03) – Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights" (PDF). Federal Register. 87 (230). U.S. Government Publishing Office: 73822–73886. December 1, 2022. Retrieved May 9, 2023.
  171. ^ Michaels, Dave (November 22, 2022). "Goldman Sachs to Pay $4 Million to Settle Investigation Over ESG Funds". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved November 23, 2022.
  172. ^ Vanderford, Richard (December 6, 2022). "U.S. Bank Regulator's Climate Push About Mitigating Risk, Not Steering Policy, Official Says". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  173. ^ Pontecorvo, Emily (March 29, 2023). "USDA to help farmers navigate the murky world of soil carbon offsets". Salon.com. Retrieved May 23, 2023.
  174. ^ 136 Stat. 5971, Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law (United States) 117–328 (text) (PDF)
  175. ^ McFarlane, Sarah (October 24, 2021). "Carbon Offsets Are Used by Companies Seeking 'Net Zero,' but Concerns Persist". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
  176. ^ Ballard, Ed (January 25, 2022). "Tech Startups Race to Rate Carbon Offsets". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 30, 2023.
  177. ^ Niiler, Eric (July 21, 2022). "What Are Carbon Offsets, and Can They Combat Climate Change?". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
  178. ^ Ballard, Ed; Holger, Dieter (July 28, 2022). "Proposed Rules Aim to Build Trust in Carbon-Credit Market". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 30, 2023.
  179. ^ Holger, Dieter (January 18, 2023). "Coming Soon to Carbon-Credit Markets: New Principles Aiming to Enhance Quality". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 30, 2023.
  180. ^ Shifflett, Shane; Holger, Dieter (February 7, 2023). "Carbon-Credit Raters Aim to Assess a Notoriously Opaque Market". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
  181. ^ Newburger, Emma (March 21, 2023). "Major registries in the carbon offset market are allowing dubious credits, report says". CNBC. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
  182. ^ Holger, Dieter (January 12, 2023). "FTC Weighs Stiff Penalties on Deceptive 'Green' Marketing". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved January 12, 2023.
  183. ^ "FTC Seeks Public Comment on Potential Updates to its 'Green Guides' for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims" (Press release). Federal Trade Commission. December 14, 2022. Retrieved January 12, 2023.
  184. ^ "FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (16 CFR Part 260 RIN 3084–AB15) – Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims" (PDF). Federal Register. 87 (243). U.S. Government Publishing Office: 77766–77770. December 20, 2022. Retrieved January 12, 2023.
  185. ^ Graham, Megan (August 9, 2022). "What Brands Should Know as FTC Prepares to Update Green Marketing Guidelines". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 24, 2023.
  186. ^ "How to Spot Greenwashing: When Companies Aren't as Green as They Claim". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. April 24, 2023. Retrieved May 1, 2023.
  187. ^ "Federal Trade Commission Extends Public Comment Period on Potential Updates to its Green Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims" (Press release). Federal Trade Commission. January 31, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
  188. ^ Cox, Jeff (January 17, 2023). "Fed directs big banks to disclose how they are preparing for climate change risks". CNBC. Retrieved January 18, 2023.
  189. ^ "Federal Reserve Board provides additional details on how its pilot climate scenario analysis exercise will be conducted and the information on risk management practices that will be gathered over the course of the exercise" (Press release). Federal Reserve Board of Governors. January 17, 2023. Retrieved January 18, 2023.
  190. ^ Cox, Chelsey (February 8, 2023). "SEC to increase scrutiny of crypto-trading firms and ESG funds in 2023". CNBC. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  191. ^ Eaglesham, Jean; Kiernan, Paul (February 3, 2023). "SEC Considers Easing Climate-Disclosure Rules After Investor Pushback". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  192. ^ Cox, Chelsey (February 10, 2023). "SEC weighs making 'adjustments' to controversial climate risk disclosure rule, Chairman Gensler says". CNBC. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  193. ^ Eaglesham, Jean; Kiernan, Paul (May 17, 2022). "Fight Brews Over Cost of SEC Climate-Change Rules". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  194. ^ Thomas, Ken (March 20, 2023). "Joe Biden Issues First Veto, Rejecting Attempt to Block ESG Effort". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  195. ^ Iacurci, Greg (March 21, 2023). "Biden used first veto to save a 401(k) investment rule. Here's what it does". CNBC. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  196. ^ Bazail-Eimil, Eric (February 28, 2023). "House Passes Bill Taking Aim at ESG Investments". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
  197. ^ Wilkie, Christina (March 1, 2023). "Senate overturns federal rule on ESG investments, Biden vows to veto". CNBC. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  198. ^ Cox, Chelsey (March 6, 2023). "SEC Chair Gensler says 'Scope 3' emissions disclosures aren't 'well developed,' hinting they could be scaled back in climate rule". CNBC. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  199. ^ Eaglesham, Jean; Shifflett, Shane (August 10, 2021). "How Much Carbon Comes From a Liter of Coke? Companies Grapple With Climate Change Math". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  200. ^ Eaglesham, Jean (September 3, 2021). "Companies Are Tallying Their Carbon Emissions, but the Data Can Be Tricky". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  201. ^ Eaglesham, Jean; Kiernan, Paul (February 18, 2022). "Climate Disclosure Poses Thorny Questions for SEC as Rules Weighed". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  202. ^ Ballard, Ed (April 14, 2022). "Scope 3 Rules Hinder Progress on Emissions, Researchers Say". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  203. ^ Shifflett, Shane; Eaglesham, Jean (April 17, 2023). "Climate Rules Expose Surprising Splits Among Businesses". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  204. ^ Vanderford, Richard (April 25, 2023). "SEC's Climate-Disclosure Rule Isn't Here, but It May as Well Be, Many Businesses Say". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  205. ^ Holger, Dieter (April 25, 2023). "Climate-Disclosure Rules Are Coming. Here's How Companies Are Adapting". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  206. ^ Holger, Dieter (May 18, 2023). "Carbon Accounting Changes Could Lift Corporate Greenhouse-Gas Emissions". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
  207. ^ "FTC to Host Workshop on "Recyclable" Claims as Part of its Ongoing Review of the Agency's Green Guides" (Press release). Federal Trade Commission. March 1, 2023. Retrieved May 1, 2023.
  208. ^ "Plastic Wars". FRONTLINE. Season 38. Episode 15. March 31, 2020. PBS. WGBH. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
  209. ^ Evans, Dain (December 26, 2020). "Managing the electronic waste problem will take a much bigger commitment". CNBC. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  210. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (March 2, 2020). "Apple to pay up to $500 million to settle U.S. lawsuit over slow iPhones". Reuters. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
  211. ^ Shead, Sam (October 14, 2020). "Sustainability experts welcome Apple's move to scrap iPhone accessories, call for more action on e-waste". CNBC. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
  212. ^ Allyn, Bobby (November 18, 2020). "Apple Agrees To Pay $113 Million To Settle 'Batterygate' Case Over iPhone Slowdowns". NPR. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
  213. ^ Gammon, Katharine (May 5, 2022). "US is recycling just 5% of its plastic waste, studies show". The Guardian. Retrieved December 18, 2022.
  214. ^ Westervelt, Amy (May 11, 2022). "Exxon doubles down on 'advanced recycling' claims that yield few results". The Guardian. Retrieved December 18, 2022.
  215. ^ Woods, Bob (May 13, 2023). "Recycling 'end-of-life' solar panels, wind turbines, is about to be climate tech's big waste business". CNBC. Retrieved May 15, 2023.
  216. ^ Pisani, Bob (April 18, 2023). "SEC's Gensler in congressional hot seat today over climate change and crypto". CNBC. Retrieved April 24, 2023.
  217. ^ "SEC Chair Testifies at House Oversight Hearing". C-SPAN. April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 24, 2023.
  218. ^ Behnam, Rostin (April 20, 2023). "What's the Federal Role in Improving Carbon Credits?" (Interview). Interviewed by Sasha Mackler. Bipartisan Policy Center. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
  219. ^ Kahn, Debra (April 21, 2023). "It's the economy, stupid". Politico. Axel Springer SE. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
  220. ^ Ellfeldt, Avery (April 21, 2023). "More oversight of carbon credits needed, CFTC chief says". Politico Pro. Axel Springer SE. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
  221. ^ Shifflett, Shane (September 24, 2022). "Carbon-Credit Surplus Could Soon Turn to Shortage". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
  222. ^ Hodgson, Camilla (October 14, 2022). "US senators push for regulator crackdown on carbon offsets market". Financial Times. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
  223. ^ Shifflett, Shane (December 16, 2022). "Carbon-Credit Investors Start to Pay Up for Quality". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
  224. ^ "CFTC Announces Second Voluntary Carbon Markets Convening on July 19" (Press release). Commodity Futures Trading Commission. June 27, 2023. Retrieved July 12, 2023.
  225. ^ Jaiswal, Rishabh (June 20, 2023). "US regulator seeks whistleblower tips on carbon markets misconduct". Reuters. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved July 12, 2023.
  226. ^ "CFTC Whistleblower Office Issues Alert Seeking Tips Relating to Carbon Markets Misconduct" (Press release). Commodity Futures Trading Commission. June 20, 2023. Retrieved July 12, 2023.
  227. ^ Vanderford, Richard (September 12, 2023). "SEC Chair Gensler Declines to Give Timeline for Final Climate Disclosure Rule". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved September 13, 2023.
  228. ^ "Securities and Exchange Commission Oversight Hearing". C-SPAN. September 12, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2023.
  229. ^ Newburger, Emma (February 12, 2021). "Biden's climate change strategy looks to pay farmers to curb carbon footprint". CNBC. Retrieved December 3, 2022.
  230. ^ Petrova, Magdalena (June 25, 2021). "How capturing CO2 has become a new business for farmers". CNBC. Retrieved December 3, 2022.
  231. ^ Watson, Sara Kiley (November 22, 2021). "Biden's infrastructure act bets big on 3 types of 'green' energy tech". Popular Science. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
  232. ^ Budryk, Zack (May 19, 2022). "Energy Department launches $3.5 billion carbon removal program". The Hill. Nexstar Media Group. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
  233. ^ Calma, Justine (May 19, 2022). "The Department of Energy to dole out $3.5 billion for carbon removal hubs". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved July 18, 2022.
  234. ^ Rubin, Ben (October 25, 2022). "Keep all carbon removal approaches on the table at COP27". The Hill. Nexstar Media Group. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
  235. ^ Jones, Benji (August 16, 2022). "Hidden inside the Inflation Reduction Act: $20 billion to help fix our farms". Vox. Vox Media. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
  236. ^ "Inflation Reduction Act Investments in FPAC Programs". U.S. Department of Agriculture. September 12, 2022. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
  237. ^ "Inflation Reduction Act of 2022". U.S. Department of Energy Loan Programs Office. Retrieved March 27, 2023.
  238. ^ Lee, Jinjoo (August 2, 2022). "Inflation Bill's Got a Perk for Some Oil Companies". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
  239. ^ Verma, Pranshu; Halper, Evan (August 12, 2022). "The Inflation Reduction Act could push climate change tech into the future". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
  240. ^ Petrova, Magdalena (March 6, 2021). "The big problem with capturing carbon is that it simply doesn't pay". CNBC. Retrieved December 8, 2022.
  241. ^ Brigham, Katie (June 28, 2022). "Why Big Tech is pouring money into carbon removal". CNBC. Retrieved July 6, 2022.
  242. ^ Niiler, Eric (October 28, 2022). "Carbon-Capture Projects Are Taking Off. Here's How They Stash the Greenhouse Gas". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved November 27, 2022.
  243. ^ Global Status of CCS 2022 (PDF) (Report). Global CCS Institute. 2022. pp. 7, 16–18, 53–62. Retrieved November 27, 2022.
  244. ^ Global Status of CCS 2022 Report: Fact Sheet (PDF) (Report). Global CCS Institute. 2022. Retrieved November 27, 2022.
  245. ^ "Executive Order on Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability". The White House. December 8, 2021. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
  246. ^ Phillips, Anna (January 9, 2022). "Biden faces delay in udoing Trump war on dishwashers, driers and lightbulbs that made him look orange". Washington Post. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
  247. ^ Portuondo, Nico (June 2022). "Biden using building codes against inflation, climate change". Greenwire. Retrieved June 3, 2022.
  248. ^ "DOE Proposes Stronger Appliance Efficiency Standards". Climate Nexus. Ecowatch. February 13, 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
  249. ^ Montalbano, Vanessa (October 26, 2023). "In Kentucky, coal is on the ballot. But not climate change". Washington Post. Retrieved October 27, 2023.
  250. ^ "Housing, Energy, and Consumer Groups Applaud Senate Opposition to Raising Energy Prices for Americans". ACEE. Retrieved October 27, 2023.
  251. ^ FR–6271–N–01 Preliminary Determination: Adoption of Energy Efficiency Standards for New Construction of HUD- and USDA-Financed Housing. the Department of Housing and Urban Development. May 18, 2023. Retrieved October 27, 2023.
  252. ^ "Biden-Harris Administration Outlines "America the Beautiful" Initiative". US department of the Interior. May 6, 2021. Retrieved August 3, 2021.
  253. ^ "Joe Biden's Monumental Environmental Gambit". The New York Times. The New York Times. July 17, 2021. Retrieved August 3, 2021.
  254. ^ "Biden-Harris Administration Launches $1 Billion America the Beautiful Challenge to Support and Accelerate Locally Led Conservation and Restoration Projects | CEQ". The White House. April 11, 2022. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  255. ^ Judid, Donald (October 8, 2021). "Biden undoes Trump's cuts to Bears Ears, Grand Staircase–Escalante, and Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine national monuments". CNN. Retrieved March 16, 2022.
  256. ^ a b "FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Takes New Action to Conserve and Restore America's Lands and Waters". The White House. March 21, 2023. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  257. ^ Voyles Pulver, Dinah; Rice, Doyle (March 21, 2021). "Climate advocates say the oceans are overlooked in climate change. Biden's new action plan would change that". USA today. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
  258. ^ Hananel, Sam. "The Biden Administration Has Reached Conservation Records in 2023". Center for American progress. Retrieved December 24, 2023.
  259. ^ "Biden Administration Backs Oil Sands Pipeline Project". The New York Times. July 24, 2021.
  260. ^ "'Squad' members call on Biden to shut down Line 3 pipeline in Minnesota". The Hill. September 3, 2021.
  261. ^ Davenport, Coral (June 9, 2021). "The Keystone XL pipeline project has been terminated". The New York Times. The New York Times. Retrieved June 11, 2021.
  262. ^ a b Rosenberg, Andrew (January 25, 2021). "Consequential Biden Actions Nobody Is Talking About". Ecowatch. Retrieved January 29, 2021.
  263. ^ Karnowski, Steve. "Biden Administration Delivers Serious Blow to Minnesota Mine". U.S.News. Retrieved November 21, 2021.
  264. ^ Karnowski, Steve. "Minnesota lets public weigh in on adequacy of mining rules". St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Archived from the original on November 22, 2021. Retrieved November 21, 2021.
  265. ^ Friedman, Lisa (April 19, 2022). "Biden Restores Climate to Landmark Environmental Law, Reversing Trump". The New York Times. The New York Times. Retrieved April 26, 2022.
  266. ^ "Will Biden's Temporary Pause of Gas Export Projects Win Back Young Voters?". Inside climate news. January 26, 2024. Retrieved February 2, 2024.
  267. ^ Irfan, Umair (January 30, 2024). "The great American natural gas reckoning is upon us". Vox. Retrieved February 2, 2024.
  268. ^ Milman, Oliver (January 26, 2024). "Biden hits pause on natural gas projects amid plans for carbon 'mega bombs'". The Guardian. Retrieved February 2, 2024.
  269. ^ Malakoff, David (January 27, 2021). "Biden orders sweeping review of government science integrity policies". Science | AAAS. Retrieved June 23, 2021.
  270. ^ a b Visser, Nick (February 21, 2022). "U.S. Freezes New Oil And Gas Projects Amid GOP Suit Over Social Cost Of Emissions". Huffington Post. Retrieved February 21, 2022.
  271. ^ Friedman, Lisa (March 2, 2021). "Reversing Trump, Interior Department Moves Swiftly on Climate Change". The New York Times. The New York Times. Retrieved March 7, 2021.
  272. ^ Milman, Oliver (May 27, 2021). "Biden officials condemned for backing Trump-era Alaska drilling project". The Guardian. Retrieved May 30, 2021.
  273. ^ Sullivan, Kaitlin (June 2, 2021). "Biden Suspends Oil Leases in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge While Supporting Drilling Elsewhere in Alaska". Ecowatch. Retrieved June 6, 2021.
  274. ^ Gregory Wallace (June 16, 2021). "Federal court temporarily blocks Biden administration's oil and gas lease pause". CNN.
  275. ^ "'Huge Victory' as Judge Blocks Biden's Oil Lease Sale in Gulf of Mexico". Common Dreams. January 28, 2022. Retrieved January 28, 2022.
  276. ^ Frazin, Rachel (January 28, 2022). "Court nixes offshore drilling leases auctioned by Biden administration". The Hill. Retrieved January 28, 2022.
  277. ^ Lauren Wollack et al. Press release. (27 January 2022). "Court Finds Massive Offshore Oil Lease Sale in Gulf Based on Faulty Legal Analysis". Earthjustice website Retrieved 28 January 2022.
  278. ^ Ben Geman. (27 January 2022). "Judge nixes Gulf of Mexico oil leases in climate-focused ruling". Yahoo News website Retrieved 28 January 2022.
  279. ^ Dutton, Jack (November 15, 2021). "Biden Admin Set to Auction Off Over 80 Million Acres to Oil and Gas Drilling Companies". Newsweek. Retrieved November 24, 2021.
  280. ^ "Companies bid $192 million in 1st Gulf oil sale under Biden". The Columbian. Retrieved June 25, 2021.
  281. ^ Daly, Matthew (May 12, 2022). "Biden cancels offshore oil lease sale in Cook Inlet citing lack of interest". Associated Press. Alaska Public Media. Retrieved May 22, 2022.
  282. ^ Kinery, Emma (April 4, 2023). "Biden administration pushes to revitalize coal communities with clean energy projects". CNBC. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
  283. ^ FACT SHEET: Biden-⁠Harris Administration Announces New Clean Energy Projects to Revitalize Energy Communities, Support Coal Workers, and Reduce Reliance on Competitors Like China (Report). White House Office. April 4, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
  284. ^ Staff (13 August 2021). "Senate passes infrastructure bill". World Nuclear News website Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  285. ^ Casey-Lefkowitz, Susan; Bergen, Sujatha (June 1, 2021). "Biden Budget Eliminates Host of Fossil Fuel Subsidies". NRDC. Retrieved July 1, 2021.
  286. ^ "White House pushing for 80% clean U.S. power grid by 2030, source says". CNBC. April 26, 2021. Retrieved July 1, 2021.
  287. ^ a b c Rosane, Olivia (January 28, 2021). "Biden Signs Sweeping Executive Orders on Climate and Science". Ecowatch. Retrieved January 31, 2021.
  288. ^ Stech Ferek, Katy; Puko, Timothy (June 4, 2021). "Biden Administration Moves to Restore Protections for Endangered Wildlife". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved July 6, 2021.
  289. ^ "Biden Moves To Restore Endangered Species Protections Eroded By Trump". HuffPost. June 5, 2021. Retrieved July 6, 2021.
  290. ^ "Biden Administration Rescinds Trump Rule Limiting Habitat Protections for Endangered Species". Center for Biological Diversity. Retrieved October 19, 2022.
  291. ^ "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical Habitat". Federal Register. Retrieved October 19, 2022.
  292. ^ "COP26: World leaders promise to end deforestation by 2030". BBC News. November 2, 2021.
  293. ^ "Over 100 global leaders pledge to end deforestation by 2030". Reuters. November 3, 2021.
  294. ^ Tokar, Dylan (November 18, 2021). "FinCEN Asks Banks to Watch for Transactions Linked to Environmental Crimes". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  295. ^ "Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions". US EPA. December 29, 2015. Retrieved June 20, 2021.
  296. ^ Foote, Cecily (November 16, 2020). "What Do The Election Results Mean For Biking and Walking?". The League of American Bicyclists. Archived from the original on December 2, 2020. Retrieved February 2, 2021.
  297. ^ "Proposed Rule to Revise Existing National GHG Emissions Standards for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks Through Model Year 2026". July 16, 2021. Retrieved August 6, 2021.
  298. ^ Rosane, Olivia (December 21, 2021). "Reversing Trump Rollback, Biden's EPA Announces Historically Ambitious Vehicle Emissions Standards". Ecowatch. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
  299. ^ "Biden admin announces tougher fuel mileage standards". Axios. December 20, 2021. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
  300. ^ Daly, Matthew (December 20, 2021). "Biden boosts fuel-economy standards to fight climate change". APN. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
  301. ^ Newburger, Emma (April 12, 2023). "EPA proposes auto pollution limits to aggressively boost electric vehicle sales". CNBC. Retrieved April 12, 2023.
  302. ^ Thomas, Ken; Felton, Ryan (April 12, 2023). "EPA Seeks to Boost EVs With Toughest-Ever Rules on Tailpipe Emissions". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 12, 2023.
  303. ^ Ferek, Katy Stech; Foldy, Ben (August 5, 2021). "Biden Toughens Fuel-Efficiency Standards, Challenges Auto Makers to Sell More EVs". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved April 12, 2023.
  304. ^ Duncan, Ian (November 22, 2023). "States must target transportation carbon emission cuts under new federal rule". Washington Post. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
  305. ^ Newburger, Emma (February 7, 2021). "Feds will spend $1 billion to spur farmers and ranchers to fight climate change". CNBC. Retrieved February 10, 2022.
  306. ^ Peikes, Katie (February 8, 2022). "USDA announces $1 billion to fund projects to help fight climate change". Kansas City Public Radio. Retrieved February 10, 2022.
  307. ^ PRAKASH, NIDHI. "Senate votes to restore urban agriculture funds". Politico. Retrieved October 27, 2023.
  308. ^ "Biden administration announces $120M for tribes hit by climate change's effects". opb. Retrieved July 28, 2023.
  309. ^ Flavelle, Christopher (November 30, 2022). "U. S. to Pay Millions to Move Tribes Threatened by Climate Change". The New York Times. Retrieved July 28, 2023.
  310. ^ "President Biden signs proclamation recognizing Indigenous Peoples' Day". TODAY.com. October 9, 2021. Retrieved July 28, 2023.
  311. ^ "Climate change: US formally withdraws from Paris agreement". BBC News. November 4, 2020. Retrieved July 20, 2021.
  312. ^ Volcovici, Valerie; Hunnicutt, Trevor (January 20, 2021). "Biden set to rejoin Paris climate accord, impose curbs on U.S. oil industry Author of the article". Financial Times. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  313. ^ "Secretary-General welcomes US return to Paris Agreement on Climate Change". UN News. United Nations. January 20, 2021. Retrieved January 22, 2021.
  314. ^ Berardelli, Jeff (February 20, 2021). "Climate change and record cold: What's behind the arctic extremes in Texas". CBC News. Retrieved February 22, 2021.
  315. ^ Finnegan, Conor (February 19, 2021). "'The decisive decade': Biden climate envoy John Kerry sounds alarm as US rejoins Paris climate accord". ABC News. Retrieved February 21, 2021.
  316. ^ Aton, Adam. "Biden Pushes U.S.—and the World—to Help Climate Migrants". Scientific American. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  317. ^ Lo, Joe (February 8, 2021). "Biden orders adviser to explore options for resettling climate migrants". Climate Home News. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  318. ^ "Biden administration to unveil more climate policies, urges China to toughen emissions target". Reuters/dv. CNA. January 24, 2021. Archived from the original on February 3, 2021. Retrieved January 29, 2021.
  319. ^ Chemnick, Jean. "Earth Day Summit Will Mark U.S. Return to Global Climate Talks". Scientific American. E&E News.
  320. ^ "New momentum reduces emissions gap, but huge gap remains - analysis". Carbon Action Tracker. Retrieved April 27, 2021.
  321. ^ "Global Update: Climate Summit Momentum". Carbon Action Tracker. Retrieved May 4, 2021.
  322. ^ Harrabin, Roger (May 4, 2021). "Climate change: Promises will mean rise of 2.4C - study". BBC. Retrieved May 4, 2021.
  323. ^ "Leaders Summit Showcases Clean Energy Commitments to Tackle Global Climate Crisis". SDG KNOWLEDGE HUB. International Institute for Sustainable development. Retrieved May 2, 2021.
  324. ^ Sommer, Lauren (November 13, 2021). "Here's what world leaders agreed to — and what they didn't — at the U.N. climate summit". NPR. Retrieved November 20, 2021.
  325. ^ "U.S.-China Joint Glasgow Declaration on Enhancing Climate Action in the 2020s". U.S. Department of State. the United States Government. Retrieved November 19, 2021.
  326. ^ Volcovici, Valerie (December 11, 2021). "Biden orders U.S. to stop financing new carbon-intense projects abroad". Euronews.next. Retrieved December 12, 2021.
  327. ^ Barrington, Lisa (February 20, 2022). "EXCLUSIVE U.S.-UAE push for another $4 billion in farming climate change investment". Reuters. Retrieved February 21, 2022.
  328. ^ a b c Lewis, Joanna I. (2023). Cooperating for the Climate: Learning from International Partnerships in China's Clean Energy Sector. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-54482-5.
  329. ^ Toplensky, Rochelle (July 25, 2023). "Stock Exchange Regulators Back Global Climate-Reporting Rules". The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  330. ^ a b Rosenbaum, Eric (January 31, 2021). "Biden's climate change plan and the battle for America's most threatened workers". CNBC. Retrieved August 4, 2021.
  331. ^ Krattenmaker, Tom (February 16, 2021). "Climate chaos is the real job killer. Biden's clean energy plan will boost the economy". USA today. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  332. ^ "Immediate Climate Action Can Save U.S. $3.5 Trillion Over Time". Climate Nexus. Ecowatch. February 4, 2021. Retrieved February 18, 2021.
  333. ^ Germanos, Andrea (January 21, 2021). "Youth Climate Leaders Say Global Future Depends on Biden Being Bold". Ecowatch. Retrieved January 27, 2021.
  334. ^ Moritz-Rabson, Daniel (May 30, 2019). "Joe Biden Has Second-Worst Policy on Climate Change Among Democratic Contenders: Greenpeace Evaluation". Retrieved March 4, 2021.
  335. ^ Rall, Ted (October 26, 2020). "The Green Alternative to Red and Blue". Retrieved March 4, 2021.
  336. ^ Lederman, Josh (March 18, 2021). "21 Republican-led states sue Biden over Keystone XL rejection". NBC. Retrieved August 9, 2021.
  337. ^ Newburger, Emma (March 24, 2021). "14 GOP state attorneys general sue Biden administration over oil and gas leasing moratorium". CNBC. Retrieved August 9, 2021.
  338. ^ Rosane, Olivia (July 27, 2021). "17 States Under Heat Alerts as Fifth Summer Heat Wave in the U.S. Begins". Ecowatch. Retrieved August 9, 2021.
  339. ^ Wolf, Zachary B. (June 20, 2021). "The American West is drying out. Things will get ugly". CNN. Retrieved July 16, 2021.
  340. ^ Roewe, Brian (February 17, 2022). "As Build Back Better stalls, faith leaders call Biden, Senate to 'moment for courage' on climate". National Catholic Reporter. Retrieved February 28, 2022.
Bundled references